GAGAN BHARTI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,DELHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD EXEMPTION 1(2), DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that although the assessee did not comply with the notices issued by the CIT(A), the order was passed without waiting for the assessee's response to the last notice. Therefore, the Tribunal deemed it appropriate to restore the matter to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed a NIL income return for AY 2018-19. The case was selected for scrutiny and the assessment order was passed at an income of Rs. 8,42,40,301/-. The assessee preferred an appeal before the CIT(A) which was dismissed ex-parte. The assessee has now filed an appeal before the Tribunal.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the appeal ex-parte without waiting for the assessee's response to the last notice, and whether the assessment order was passed without considering the assessee's submissions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 250,Section 143(3),Section 143(3A),Section 143(3B),Section 13(7),Section 115BBC
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘A’, NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, HON’BLE VICE- & MRS. RENU JAUHRI, HON’BLE
PER RENU JAUHRI :
The above captioned appeal is preferred before the Tribunal against the order dated 12.03.2025, passed by Ld. CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (for short, NFAC), Delhi u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as, “Act”), in Appeal No. NFAC/2017-18/10038487 for A.Y. 2018-
The Assessee has raised following grounds of Appeal which are reproduced as below:
“ 1. That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre Gagan Bharti Educational Society Delhi (hereinafter referred to as "NFAC") under Secti
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 115BBC
- Vishranthi Trust, Bangalore vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-2 Exemptions…ITA 2495/BANG/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Shree Rajgor Brahmin Pragati Mandal… vs ITO (E) Ward2(3) Mumbai, MumbaiITA 3433/MUM/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- Adivasi Deomogra Education Society, at… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2432/PUN/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed7 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Betestha Charitable Trust, East Godavari… vs ITO (Exemption Ward), RajahmundryITA 622/VIZ/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Aug 2026AY 2018-19
- Anil Swathi Balram Foundation, Vijayawada vs The Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward…ITA 34/VIZ/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed13 Aug 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026