M/S.MOORGATE INDUSTRIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED (FORMERLY: STEMCOR INDIA P.LTD),MUMBAI vs. ACIT 1(3)(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) should not dismiss an appeal for not being filed in electronic mode without considering the merits. The appeal was set aside to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the CIT(A) manually, instead of electronically as required. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal on this preliminary ground without adjudicating the merits.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal filed manually before the CIT(A) can be dismissed without considering the merits of the case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D”, BENCH
आदेश / O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M): This appeal in A.Y.2012-13 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A), Mumbai-3/10356/2016-17 dated 26/03/2018 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment passed u/s.143(3)of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act) dated 27/04/2016 by the ld. Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1(3)(1), Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as ld. AO). 2. The only effective issue to be decided in this appeal is that the assessee had raised several grounds on merits, it has raised a preliminary ground No.1 questioning the dismissal of the appeal of the assessee by
M/s.Moorgate Industries India Pvt.Ltd. the ld. CIT(A) on the ground that appeal was not preferred by the assessee before the ld. CIT(A) in electronic mode.
None appeared on behalf of the assessee.
3.1. We have heard the ld. DR. It is not in dispute that the assessee has preferred an appeal within time before the ld. CIT(A) manually. It is a fact that assessee had not preferred any appeal before the ld. CIT(A) in electronic mode. This Tribunal has been consistently holding that even if the appeal has been filed manually before the ld. CIT(A) instead of electronic form, the ld. CIT(A) cannot dismiss the appeal of the assessee without adjudicating the issue on merits. Accordingly, we deem it fit and appropriate to set aside this appeal to the file of the ld. CIT(A) with a direction to admit the appeal and consider the grounds raised thereon afresh in accordance with law. The assessee is also given liberty to raise additional grounds and furnish additional evidences, if any, in support of its contentions, if they so desire. Since the appeal has been set aside to the file of the ld. CIT(A) on preliminary ground, the adjudication of other grounds on merits does not arise at this stage.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on this 11/09/2019
Sd/- Sd/- (RAM LAL NEGI) (M.BALAGANESH) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai; Dated 11/09/2019 KARUNA, sr.ps
M/s.Moorgate Industries India Pvt.Ltd.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026