PAREKH MARKETING LTD,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-WARD-1(2)(3), MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal considered the assessee's request and allowed the withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for AY 2013-14. The assessee subsequently requested to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal should be granted.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C”
Before: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, AM & SHRI RAM LAL NEGI, JM
आदेशकीप्रनिनिनिअग्रेनर्ि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथी/ The Appellant 2. प्रत्यथी/ The Respondent आयकरआयुक्त(अपील) / The CIT(A) 3. 4. आयकरआयुक्त/ CIT- concerned 5. यवभागीयप्रयतयनयि, आयकरअपीलीयअयिकरण, मुंबई/ DR, ITAT, Mumbai
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S B.K. Agency Under The Proprietor Of Bhola Prasad vs. The Chief Commissioner, CGSTPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- Shree Hanumant Steel Traders vs. Assistant CommissionerChhattisgarh · 1 Nov 2026
- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026