GOPALKRISHNA NARLA RAO,MUMBAI vs. ACIT 16(2), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 5444/MUM/2018Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 September 2019AY 2013-143 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that mere technical lapses should not deprive an assessee of justice. The assessee was directed to e-file the appeal within 10 days, and the first appellate authority was instructed to adjudicate it on merits.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal manually instead of electronically, as required by Rule 45 of the Income Tax Rules. The first appellate authority dismissed the appeal on this technical ground.

What were the issues?

Whether an appeal filed manually, when e-filing is mandatory, should be dismissed on technical grounds without considering the merits.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Rule 45 of Income Tax Rules

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI

Before: HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JM & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM

For Appellant: Shri N.G.Rao-Ld. AR
For Respondent: Shri Akhtar H. Ansari- Ld.DR, Shri N.G.Rao-Ld. AR

आदेश / O R D E R

Per Bench: - 1. The grievance of the assessee in this appeal stem from the fact that Ld. first appellate authority has dismissed the assessee’s appeal on technical ground since the appeal was filed manually, which as per the extant Rule 45 of Income Tax Rules, was required to be e-filed in the Gopal Krishna Narla Rao prescribed manner. The date of the impugned order is 28/03/2018. We have heard and considered the rival arguments.

2.

Facts on record would reveal that the assessee has been assessed u/s 143(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961 on 29/03/2016 wherein the assessee was saddled with certain additions /disallowances. The assessee preferred appeal against the same before first appellate authority manually in paper form on 29/04/2016 which is well within time prescribed for preferring the appeal against the assessment order. However, since the appeal was filed in paper form, which as per amended Rule 45 effective from 01/03/2016 was required to be filed electronically, Ld. first appellate authority treated the same as invalid appeal and dismissed the same without any further adjudication. Aggrieved, the assessee is in further appeal before us assailing the stand taken by learned first appellate authority.

3.

Upon careful consideration, the undisputed facts that emerges are that the appeal was preferred by the assessee manually in paper form and the same was filed within time prescribed for filing the appeal. However, the said appeal in terms of CBDT Notification No. SO 637(E) [No. 11/2016 (F. No. 149/150/2015-TPL)], dated 1-3-2016, was required to file digitally in electronic form. The failure to file the same in the prescribed form has resulted into dismissal of appeal in limine. Keeping in view the principles of natural justice, we are of the considered opinion that mere technical lapses could not deprive the assessee to seek justice in deserving cases. Therefore, in terms of the judgment of this Tribunal rendered in All India Federation of Tax Petitioners Vs. ITO [ITA No. 7134/Mum/2017 dated Gopal Krishna Narla Rao 04/05/2018], the assessee is directed to e-file the appeal in the prescribed manner before Ld. first appellate authority within 10 days from the date of receipt of this order. Thereafter, the Ld. first appellate authority is directed to admit the appeal and adjudicate the same on merits.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →