DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE- 1, THANE vs. BAYER PHARMACEUTICALS PRIVATE LIMITED, THANE
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the issue was identical to a previous decision by a co-ordinate bench in the assessee's own case. Following that precedent, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the deletion of an addition made by the AO on account of freebies given to doctors, which the AO considered a violation of MCI circulars and thus not a business expenditure. The assessee argued that the issue was covered by a previous decision in their own case.
What were the issues?
Whether expenses incurred by a pharmaceutical company on freebies to doctors, allegedly in violation of MCI guidelines, are disallowable as business expenditure under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Radhasoami Satsang v. CIT1,695 citing193 ITR 321 · 1992 · SC
- CIT v. Kap Scan and Diagnostic Centre (P.) Ltd.58 citing25 Taxmann.com 92 · 2012 · HC
- Smithkline Beecham) Pharmaceuticals (India) Limited v. CIT27 citing111 Taxmann 561 · 2000 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCHES “B”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY & SHRI RAJESH KUMAR
आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ� / The Appellant 1. ��यथ� / The Respondent 2. आयकर आयु�त(अपील) / The CIT(A), Mumbai 3. आयकर आयु�त / CIT, Mumbai 4. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, मुंबई / 5. DR, ITAT, Mumbai गाड� फाईल / Guard file 6.
आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, स�या�पत ��त //True Copy//
उप/सहायक पंजीकार (Dy./Asst. Registrar) आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, मुंबई / ITAT, Mumbai
More judgments on Section 37(1)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Smit Navnitlal Soni, Ahmedabad, Gujarat vs ITO Ward-5(3)(1), Ahmedabad, GujaratITA 1434/AHD/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shobha Sudamrao Tagad, Ahmednagar vs ITO WD-1, AhmednagarITA 311/PUN/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Digjam Limited, Jamnagar vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 349/RJT/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Rajesh Maru, Mhow vs ITO-5(1), IndoreITA 839/IND/2025[2023-2024]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2023-2024
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026