BROADCOM COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, BANGALORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 735/BANG/2016Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 June 2019AY 2011-121 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal is hearing appeals related to the TPO's adjustment and the AO's restriction of Section 10A deduction. The specific decision of the Tribunal is not fully detailed in the provided excerpt.

What were the facts?

The assessee, engaged in software R&D, claimed deduction under Section 10A. Due to international transactions exceeding Rs. 15 crores, the matter was referred to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO). The TPO made an adjustment to the Arm's Length Price (ALP), and the Assessing Officer (AO) restricted the Section 10A deduction.

What were the issues?

The key issues involve the adjustment made by the TPO to the ALP and the AO's restriction of the deduction claimed by the assessee under Section 10A.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 10A,Section 92CA,Section 142(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IT(TP)A Nos.480 & 735/Bang/2016 Page 2 of 9 2. For the sake of convenience, we shall take up the revenue appeal in IT(TP)A No.480/Bang/2016 and the facts narrated therein.

3.

Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is engaged in software research and development and filed the Return of income on 24/11/2011 with total income of Rs.10,10,378/- after claiming deduction u/s 10A of the Act. Subsequently, the case was selected for scrutiny under CASS and notice u/s 142(1) of the Act was issued. There was a change in the jurisdiction and the assessee was also issued notice u/s 142(1) of the Act. In compliance, ld. AR appeared from time to time and furnished the details. Since the assessee has international transactions exceeding more than Rs.15 crores, the matter was referred to the Transfer pricing Officer (TP) with the approval of the CIT.

TPO, having considered the financial statement and the transfer pricing study report made adjustment to the ALP to the extent of Rs.4,13,20,373/- and passed the order u/s 92CA of the Act.

Whereas the Assessing Officer (AO) restricted the claim of deduction u/s 10A of the Act and the assessee has filed submissions dated 19/01/2005. AO has re-worked deduction u/s 10A and the draft assessment order was sent to the assessee. The assessee filed objections against draft assessment order before the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP).

DRP, after considering the objections and submissions of the

More judgments on Section 10A

All 2,147 judgments and leading authorities on Section 10A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →