ARVINDKUMAR ATMARAM. PATEL,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-7(2)(1), AHMEDABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1403/AHD/2019Status: HeardITAT Ahmedabad27 May 2022AY 2012-132 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal considered the assessee's submission and application for withdrawal under the "Vivad se Vishwas" Scheme. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee opted to avail the benefits of the "Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020". The assessee filed an application requesting the withdrawal of the appeal before the Tribunal under this scheme.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal due to opting for the "Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme".

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “C” BENCH, AHMEDABAD

Before: Ms. SUCHITRA KAMBLE & SHRI WASEEM AHMED

For Appellant: Shri Divya S. Agrawal, A.R
For Respondent: Shri V.K. Singh, Sr. D.R
Hearing: 26.05.2022Pronounced: 27.05.2022

PER SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER :

1.

The appeal filed by the assessee arises from the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-7, Ahmedabad dated 30.04.2019, passed for Assessment Year 2012-13.

2.

We have heard the Learned Representatives of both the parties. Learned Counsel for the assessee, at the outset, submitted that assessee has opted to avail the benefits of “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020” and has also placed on record copy of Form No.3 before the Tribunal in this regard. Application in this regard requesting for withdrawal of appeal under the said Scheme is also placed on record.

3.

The learned Departmental Representative submitted that he has no objection to the withdrawal of the appeal in the circumstances narrated on behalf of the assessee.

4.

We have considered the submissions and application of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal under the Scheme “Vivad se Vishwas”. In the light of aforesaid request made by the assessee, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Page 2 of 2 However, in the event, the assessee fails to avail the benefit of “Vivad se Vishwas Scheme” for any bonafide reasons, then the assessee will be at liberty to seek restoration of original appeal for hearing before the ITAT in accordance with law.

5.

In the result, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Order pronounced in the open Court on this 27th day of May, 2022.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →