AVTAR SINGH KOCHAR,ROHTAK vs. DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the approval granted under Section 153D was invalid as it was mechanical and lacked application of mind for each assessment year. The assessment order, being based on this invalid approval, is vitiated.
What were the facts?
The assessee's assessment order was challenged on the grounds that the mandatory approval under Section 153D of the Income Tax Act was granted mechanically and without application of mind. The approval covered multiple assessment years (2013-14 to 2019-20) in a consolidated manner.
What were the issues?
Whether the approval granted under Section 153D of the Income Tax Act was valid, considering it was granted mechanically for multiple assessment years without application of mind.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- PCIT v. Shiv Kumar Nayyar597 citing163 Taxmann.com 9 · 2024 · HC · Read judgment
- PCIT v. Sapna Gupta591 citing2022 SCC OnLine ALL 1294 · 2023
- ACIT v. Serajuddin & Co.580 citing454 ITR 312 · 2023 · HC · Read judgment
- ACIT v. Serajuddin & Co.500 citing163 Taxmann.com 118 · 2024 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, DELHI
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA&
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM: These cross appeals preferred by the assessee and revenue against the order dated 28.03.2025 of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(A)-31 Delhi,
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153D
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Babita Panda, Bhubaneswar vs DCIT, Central Circle 1, BhubaneswarITA 603/CTK/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Sarat Chandra Panda, Bhubaneswar vs DCIT, Central Circle 1, BhubaneswarITA 602/CTK/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Babita Panda, Bhubaneswar vs DCIT, Central Circle 1, BhubaneswarITSSA 66/CTK/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Babita Panda, Bhubaneswar vs DCIT, Central Circle 1, BhubaneswarITSSA 65/CTK/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026