ASSISSTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JHANDEWALAN EXTN. vs. OM PRAKASH ARORA, CONNAUGHT PLACE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147/148 were valid, dismissing the assessee's cross-objection. However, the Tribunal found that the CIT(A) erred in deleting substantial additions made by the Assessing Officer concerning sham transactions and engineered losses, confirming the Assessing Officer's additions.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order, which had upheld reassessment proceedings under Section 147/148. The assessee also filed a cross-objection challenging the validity of these proceedings. The core issue revolved around the initiation of reassessment and subsequent additions made by the Assessing Officer.
What were the issues?
The primary issues were the validity of reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147/148 and the correctness of additions made by the Assessing Officer concerning alleged sham transactions and engineered losses.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 148,Section 151,Section 2(22)(e),Section 120(4)(b),Section 127
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(8)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- McDowell & Co. Ltd. v. CTO741 citing3 SCC 230 · 1985
- KOTAK MAHINDRA CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER. 367 50.(1987) 3 SCC 544: MADHAV AYAWADANRAO HOSKOT v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA. 51250 citing10 SCC 1 · 2014 · SC
- CIT v. Raj Kumar119 citing318 ITR 462 · 2009 · HC · Read judgment
- Mathuram Agrawal v. State of Madhya Pradesh70 citing8 SCC 667 · 1999 · SC
- CIT v. Jain Exports (P.) Ltd.32 citing35 Taxmann.com 540 · 2013 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Parle Plastic Ltd.27 citing332 ITR 63 · 2011 · HC
- GE Intelligent Platforms Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. ACIT5 citing139 Taxmann.com 199 · 2022
- Satpal & Sons (HUF) v. ACIT Circle-38(1), New Delhi4 citing166 ITD 616 · 2017 · ITAT
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH, ‘E’: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AMITABH SHUKLA, ACCOUNTNAT MEMBER [Assessment Year: 2015-16] Assistant Commissioner of Om Prakash Arora, Income Tax, Central Circle-01, M-3, Flat No.103, AVG Bhawan E-2, Jhandewalan Extn. Vs The Variety Books Depot. New Delhi-110055 Connaught Place, New Delhi-110001 PAN-ACCPA9774F Assessee Revenue Cross Objection No.42/Del/2025 (Arising out of ITA No.5031/Del/2024) [Assessment Year: 2015-16] Om Prakash Arora, Assistant Commissioner of Income M-3, Flat No.103, AVG Tax, Central Circle-01, Bhawan The Variety Books Vs E-2, Jhandewalan Extn. Depot. Connaught Place, New Delhi-110055 New Delhi-110001 PAN-ACCPA9774F Assessee Revenue [Assessment Year: 2016-17] Assistant Commissioner of Om Prakash Arora, Income Tax, Central Circle-01, M-3, Flat No.103, AVG Bhawan E-2, Jhandewalan Extn. Vs The Variety Books Depot. New Delhi-110055 Connaught Place, New Delhi-110001 PAN-ACCPA9774F Assessee Revenue
ITA Nos.5029 & 5031/Del/2024 & CO No.42/Del/2025
Assessee by Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. Adv. Shri Aditya Vohra, Adv. Ms. Aakarti Bansal, CA Revenue by Ms. Amisha S.Gupt, CIT(DR) Date of
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026