ACIT, CIRCLE-7(1), DELHI, DELHI vs. FIS GLOBAL BUSINESS SOLUTIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that ESOP expenditure is allowable under Section 37(1) following previous decisions. It further held that CSR expenditure, even if disallowed under Section 37(1), is eligible for deduction under Section 80G as it fulfills the conditions for donation.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order allowing ESOP expenditure as allowable under Section 37(1) and also allowing deduction under Section 80G for CSR expenses. The assessee had claimed ESOP expenses and donations made under CSR.
What were the issues?
Whether ESOP expenditure is allowable as a business expense and whether CSR expenditure qualifies for deduction under Section 80G.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(9)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- JMS Mining (P.) Ltd. v. PCIT93 citing130 Taxmann.com 118 · 2021 · ITAT
- Asst. CIT v. Anima Investment Ltd.60 citing73 ITD 125 · 2000 · ITAT
- Trib.) Goldman Sachs Services (P) Ltd. v. JCIT30 citing117 Taxmann.com 535 · 2020 · ITAT
- FNF India (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT23 citing133 Taxmann.com 251 · 2021 · ITAT
- InterGlobe Technology Quotient P Ltd. v. ACIT22 citing163 Taxmann.com 542 · 2024 · HC · Read judgment
- Sling Media (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT21 citing194 ITD 1 · 2022 · ITAT
- Optum Global Solutions (India) (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT16 citing203 ITD 14 · 2023 · ITAT
- FNF India Private Limited v. ACIT15 citing194 ITD 463 · ITAT
- DCIT v. Peerless General Finance & Investment & Co. Ltd.14 citing112 Taxmann.com 410 · 2019 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH, ‘E’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI C.N. PRASAD & SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER C.N. PRASAD, JM, This appeal is filed by the Revenue and cross objection filed by the Assessee against the order of the Ld.Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC, Delhi [herein after referred as “CIT(A)”] for the dated 10.06.2025 for the A.Y. 2020-21. 2. The revenue in its appeal raised the following grounds :-
“1.1 The Assessing Officer, National e-Assessment Centre ('AO, NeAC') and CIT(A), NFAC fail
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 37(1)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Smit Navnitlal Soni, Ahmedabad, Gujarat vs ITO Ward-5(3)(1), Ahmedabad, GujaratITA 1434/AHD/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shobha Sudamrao Tagad, Ahmednagar vs ITO WD-1, AhmednagarITA 311/PUN/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Digjam Limited, Jamnagar vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 349/RJT/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Rajesh Maru, Mhow vs ITO-5(1), IndoreITA 839/IND/2025[2023-2024]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2023-2024
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026