SWATCH GROUP (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 22(2), C.R. BUILDING
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the adjustment made by the Assessing Officer (AO) by applying the Bright Line Test in respect of AMP expenses is not sustainable in law, following the assessee's own case and High Court judgments. Consequently, the addition made by the AO was deleted.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Swatch Group (India) Private Limited, was assessed for AY 2021-22. The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) proposed an adjustment to Advertising, Marketing, and Promotion (AMP) expenses based on the Bright Line Test, considering the assessee's marketing functions created value for its Associated Enterprise (AE).
What were the issues?
Whether the Bright Line Test can be applied for transfer pricing adjustments on AMP expenses, and whether AMP expenses constitute an international transaction.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 144C(13),Section 144B,Section 92CA(3)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. EKL Appliances Ltd.422 citing345 ITR 241 · 2012 · HC · Read judgment
- Co. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs AIR 1962 SC 1893 and Commissioner of Income Tax, Bhopal v. Ralson Industries Ltd.9 citing2 SCC 326 · 1975 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH, I: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD & SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH
PER BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH, AM:
This appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the Final Assessment Order dated 29.10.2024 passed by the Learned Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 143(3) read with Sections 144C(13), r.w.s. 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”), pursuant to the directions of the Hon'ble Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) order dated 09.09.2024 for the Assessment Year 2021-22. ITA No.- 5929/Del/2024 Swatch Group (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Brief facts of the case: The Swatch Group Limited is based in Switzerland and the ultimate holding company of the Swatch Group, world's lar
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026