BALDEV PRASAD YADAV,FARIDABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 (2), FARIDABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 8201/DEL/2025Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 January 2026AY 2010-2011Bench: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA (Judicial Member)1 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal acknowledged the possibility of communication gaps and deemed it appropriate, in the interest of justice, to restore the appeal back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. The CIT(A) was directed to provide three effective opportunities of hearing.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal for assessment year 2010-11 was filed against an order involving proceedings under section 147 read with section 144 of the Income-tax Act. The assessee's counsel submitted that due to communication gaps, the assessee could not present all relevant facts in the lower appellate proceedings.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal should be restored to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication due to alleged communication gaps preventing the assessee from presenting facts.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 147,Section 144

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: “SMC” NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA

Hearing: 19.01.2026Pronounced: 19.01.2026

Date of hearing 19.01.2026 Date of pronouncement 19.01.2026 ORDER This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2010-11 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax/Addl./JCIT (A), Panaji’s order dated 08.10.2025, having DIN and order no. ITBA/APL/S/250/2025-26/1081558177(1), involving proceedings under section 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). Heard both the parties. Case file perused.

2.

Learned counsel submits that on account of communication gaps at various levels, the assessee could not appear to plead and prove all the relevant facts in the lower appellate proceedings and therefore, larger interest of justice would be met, in case, the matter may be restored back to the CIT(A). The Revenue vehemently support the learned lower authorities action making addition(s) herein on merits.

3.

Be that as it may, the fact remains that possibility of some communication gaps at various levels in such an instance could not be altogether ruled out. It is therefore deemed appropriate in the larger interest of justice to restore the assessee’s instant appeal back to the CIT(A) for his afresh appropriate adjudication, within three effective opportunities of hearing at the appellant’s risk and responsibility, in consequential proceedings. Ordered accordingly.

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →