ZULEKHA HAROON KHATRI, MUMBAI vs. ACIT - 31 (3), MUMBAI

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “G”, BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, AM & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JM ITA No.4937/Mum/2018 (Assessment Year2013-14) ACIT-31(3) Vs. Smt. Zulekha Haroom Khatri C-13/110, 1st Floor, Pratyakshakar Khatri Flat No.102, Bldg, No.4, Bhavan, BKC, Bandra (E), Mumbai- Sultanabad, Behram Baug, 400051. Jogeshwari (W), Mumbai- 400102. PAN/GIR No.AGEPK4117G Appellant) .. Respondent) Assessee by None Revenue by Shri V. Vinod Kumar( Sr. AR) Date of Hearing 04/12/2019 Date of Pronouncement 04/12/2019 O R D E R PER AMARJIT SINGH (J.M): This appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against order of the CIT(A)- 42, Mumbai dated 29/05/2018 and it pertains to AY 2013-14. 2. We have heard argument advanced by the Ld. Representative of the Department and has gone through the case carefully. During course of hearing, ld. DR for the revenue submitted that tax effect involved in this appeal filed by the revenue is less than Rs. 50 lacs and in view of latest CBDT circular No. 3/2018 dated 11-7-2018, and also modified circular No. 17/2019 dated 08/08/2019, appeal filed by the revenue is not maintainable and needs to be dismissed. The Ld. DR, further argued that, the issue involved in this appeal is appears to be covered by exception provided under clause (e) of subsequent circular and therefore, if required the revenue shall be allowed to file miscellaneous application to re-call the order. We, find that, the CBDT, recently had issued a circular no. 3/2018 dated 11-7-2018, superseding its earlier circular no. 21/2015 and enhanced monetary limit for filing appeal before various appellate authorities and accordingly, enhanced monetary limit to Rs.20,00,000/- for filing appeal before the Tribunal. Further, the board has issued one more circular vide

ITA No4937/M/2018 A.Y.2013-14 Circular no.17/2019 dated 08/08/2019 and enhanced monetary limit for filing appeal before appellate Tribunal to Rs. 50,00,000/-. Further, in the said circular, the CBDT had instructed its officer’s to file application for withdrawal of appeal already filed or not to pursue pending appeals. We, therefore, by taking into account the CBDT circular No. 3/2018 dated 11-7-2018 and Circular no.17/2019 dated 08/08/2019 and also considering the fact that tax effect involved in the present appeal is less than the amount of monetary limit fixed by the CBDT for not filing appeal, dismissed appeal filed by the revenue as not maintainable. We, further noted that the Co-ordinate bench of ITAT, Ahmedabad ‘A’ Bench in ITA. No. 1398/Ahd/2004, vide order dated 14/08/2019 has passed detailed order considering new circular issued by the CBDT and held that except amendment to para 3 of the circular No.3/2018 dated 11/07/2018, all other portions of the circular No.03/2018 (supra) have remain in fact, therefore, this circular is applicable even for pending appeals and accordingly, rejected the arguments of the revenue that the effect of the circular shall come into force from the date of issue of this circular. Therefore, considering the facts and circumstances of this case and also taken note of circulars issued by the CBDT including circular No. 17/2019 dated 08/08/2019, and also by following the decision of Co-ordinate Bench, we dismissed appeal filed by the revenue as not maintainable. However, we keep open option to the revenue to file a miscellaneous application, if necessary, in case the issues involved in the present appeal comes within 3 exceptions as provided in para 10 of said circular and clause (e) of subsequent circular. 3. In the result, this appeal by the Revenue stands dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on this 04/12/2019 Sd/- Sd/- (RAJESH KUMAR) (AMARJIT SINGH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Mumbai; Dated 04/12/2019 Vijay Pal Singh/ Sr. PS

ITA No4937/M/2018 A.Y.2013-14 Copy of the Order forwarded to : The Appellant 1. The Respondent. 2. The CIT(A), Mumbai. 3. CIT 4. DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. BY ORDER, 6. Guard file. सत्यापित प्रपत //True Copy// (Asstt. Registrar) ITAT, Mumbai