DCIT, BANGALORE vs. M/S NETSCOUT SYSTEMS SOFTWARE INDIA PVT. LTD., BANGALORE
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the revenue's appeal was not maintainable due to low tax effect, as per CBDT instructions. The appeal was dismissed on this technical ground.
What were the facts?
The revenue filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2010-11. The tax effect in the appeal was below Rs. 50 Lakhs.
What were the issues?
Maintainability of revenue's appeal due to low tax effect as per CBDT instructions.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI ARUN KUMAR GARODIA & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE
O R D E R
Per Shri A.K. Garodia, Accountant Member
This appeal is filed by the revenue and the same is directed against the order of ld. CIT(A)-IV, Bangalore dated 14.11.2014 for Assessment Year 2010-11.
Various grounds are raised by the revenue but it was pointed out by the bench in the beginning that the tax effect in the present case is below Rs. 50 Lakhs and therefore, as per recent instructions of CBDT, this appeal of revenue is not maintainable because of low tax effect. The bench pointed out that as per para 3A of Form No. 36 filed by the revenue, the income reported by the assessee in the return of income is Rs. 2,96,48,541/- and as per para 3B of Form No. 36, the assessed income is Rs. 4,05,56,082/- and hence, the total addition made by the AO is of Rs. 1.09 Crores. The bench pointed out that even if the entire addition is deleted by ld. CIT(A) and the revenue is in appeal against entire such deletion, then also the resultant tax effect of the appeal of IT(TP)A No. 56/Bang/2015 Page 2 of 2 the revenue will be less than Rs. 50 Lakhs and therefore, the appeal of the revenue is not maintainable. In reply, the ld. DR of revenue had nothing to say and accordingly, we dismiss the appeal of the revenue because of low tax effect.
In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on the date mentioned on the caption page.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026