THE ABRAHAM MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE - 1, BANGALORE
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence to substantiate the genuineness of the loans and advances received. The AO had completed the assessment to the best of his judgment without considering the evidence filed by the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee received loans and advances through banking channels, including from ATNT Infrastructure Services Pvt Ltd and Bhramaputra Power Pvt Ltd. The assessee also had a loan from Mr Sathi Prabhakar, which was a transfer of an amount originally due from Dr Abraham Abenezer. A loan from Shyam Group of Rs 3,45,000 was added as income.
What were the issues?
Whether the AO erred in completing the assessment to the best of his judgment without considering the evidence filed by the assessee regarding the genuineness of loans and advances.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
the Assessee before CIT(A) that in the hearing before the AO on 21.3.2016, the Assessee sought time to furnish the details but the AO proceeded to frame an assessment to the best of his judgment. The Assessee pointed out before CIT(A) that the loan confirmations from lenders were filed before the AO on 24.03.2016 but the AO completed assessment u/s.144 of the Act on 22.3.2016. The Assessee pleaded before CIT(A) that the loans taken by the assessee are genuine. These loans received by the assessee are through banking channels. The amount of Rs 250,00,000/- from ATNT Infrastructure Services Pvt Ltd was received on 13.10.2012. the amount was received as an advance under an agreement to sell 29 buses. The amount of loan of Rs 150,00,000/- from Bhramaputra Power Pvt Ltd was received on 12.04.2012 (Rs 100,00,000) and 14.07.2012 (Rs 50,00,000). The amount of loan shown from Mr Sathi Prabhakar was originally due to Dr Abraham Abenezer by the assessee. In a tripartite understanding during September 2012, the assessee received an instruction from Dr Abraham Ebenezer that the loan amount payable to him by the assessee to the extent of Rs 100,00,000 should be transferred in the name of Mr Sathi Prabhakar. The accounting entries giving effect to the said understanding has been passed in the books of accounts of the assessee on 05.09.2012 and 09.09.2012. The amount of loan from Shyam Group of Rs 3,45,000 has been added as income in the impugned order. The amount of Rs 3,45,000/- payable to 'Shyam Group' shown [under the head 'unsecured loan in the financial statements] represents the net figure from the following three parties belonging to the said group: Prakash L Rs 2,50,000/- Dr Ram Balram Enterprises Rs 1,80,000/- Dr
Shym Group Rs 7,75,000/- Cr Rs 3,45,000/- Cr
The loans form all the above three Parties were received during the year under consideration. Loan from Shym group was received by way of journal entry on 17.07.2012. The amount payable to Dr Abraham Ebenezer was transferred to Shym Group on his instructions. The balance of Rs 3,45,000/- has been arrived at alter adjusting payment receivable by the assessee from Prakash L [Rs 2,50,000] and Ram Balram Enterpises [Rs 1,80,000] which belong to the same group. The assessee had made payments to Prakash L and Ram Balram Enterprises during the year under consideration.
Before CIT(A), the Assessee sought to file the following documents as additional evidence with an application under Rule 46A of the IT Rules to substantiate the genuineness of all the above loans:
Lender Additional evidences being furnished under Rule 46A of the IT Rules ATNT Infrastructure (i) A copy of agreement under which Rs Services Pvt Ltd 250,00,000/- was paid by ATNT Infrastructure Pvt Ltd to the assessee as an advance towards purchase of buses. A copy of bank statement of Vijaya (ii) Bank, Residency Road Bangalore (A/c indicating receipt of loan by RTGS on 13.10.2012 Documents relating to arbitration (iii) proceedings initiated by ATNT for recovery of advance paid. Ledger account (iv)
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026