HUAWEI TELECOMMUNICATIONS (INDIA) COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED,GURGAON vs. ACIT CIRCLE-4(1), GURGAON
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that Section 144C provides a special statutory mechanism with its own distinct timelines for completing assessments after the draft order stage. Section 153 governs the period up to the draft order, while Section 144C governs the time from the draft order to the final assessment.
What were the facts?
The assessee challenged the validity of assessment orders for AYs 2016-17, 2017-18, and 2018-19 on grounds of limitation. The assessee argued that the assessment orders were passed beyond the time limits prescribed by Section 153 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, when read with Section 144C.
What were the issues?
Whether the time consumed in proceedings under Section 144C (post-draft assessment order) is subsumed within the limitation period prescribed by Section 153, or if Section 144C operates with its own distinct timelines.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(6)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Commissioner of Income Tax v. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd.269 citing445 ITR 537 · 2022 · HC
- Shelf Drilling 4. In ACIT (International Taxation) v. Shelf Drilling Ron Tappmeyer Ltd.216 citing177 Taxmann.com 262 · 2025 · SC
- CIT v. Roca Bathroom Products (P.) Ltd.178 citing147 Taxmann.com 224 · 2023 · SC
- Shelf Drilling Ron Tappmeyer Ltd. v. ACIT\n(Intl. Taxation)169 citing153 Taxmann.com 162 · 2023 · HC
- 166 Taxmann.com 521149 citing166 Taxmann.com 521 · 2024 · HC
- Aveva Solutions India LLP v. ITO123 citing181 Taxmann.com 406 · 2025
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
ITA Nos.827/D/21 With Stay 141/D/21, 2062/D/22 & 2063/D/2022 HUAWEI TELECOMMUNICATIONS (INDIA) COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “I”NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.827/Del/2021 निर्धारणवर्ष/Assessment Year: 2016-17 HUAWEI TELECOMMUNICATIONS (INDIA) COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED, 9th Floor, Capital Cyberscape, Sector-59, Gurugram, Manesar Urban Complex, Ullahwas, Gurgaon, Haryana. PAN No.AABCH1376E बनाम Vs. ACIT, अपीलार्थी Appellant Circle 4(1), Gurgaon, Haryana. प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent Stay Appl. No.141/Del/2021 (In ITA No.827/D/2021)
Assessment Year 2016-17 ACIT, Circle 4(1), Gurgaon, Haryana. बनाम Vs. HUAWEI TELECOMMUNICATIONS (INDIA) COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED, 9th Floor, Capital Cyberscape, Sector-59, Gurugram, Manesar Urban Complex, Ullahwas, Gurgaon, Haryana. अपीलार्थी Appellant PAN No.AABCH1376E प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.2062/Del/2022 निर्धारणवर्ष/Assessment Year: 2017-18 HUAWEI TELECOMMUNICATIONS (INDIA) COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED, 9th Floor, Capital Cyberscape, Sector-59, Gurugram, Manesar Urban Complex, Ullahwas, Gurgaon, Haryana. PAN No.AABCH1376E बनाम
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144C
- Mishoo Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 19/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 18/KOL/2026[2016-2017]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2016-2017
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 17/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 16/KOL/2026[2014-2015]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2014-2015
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 15/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026