PROFORM INTERIORS PRIVATE LIMITED,GURGAON vs. DCIT CC-20, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings for AY 2012-13 were time-barred. It referred to the Supreme Court's decision in Rajiv Bansal, emphasizing that the proviso to Section 149(1)(b) limits the retrospective operation of the amended section and protects assessees from reopening assessments beyond the old time limits.
What were the facts?
The assessee, engaged in furniture manufacturing and interior designing, had its premises searched. Subsequently, reassessment proceedings were initiated under Section 147 for AY 2012-13, with the Assessing Officer estimating profits on undisclosed sales. The CIT(A) quashed the reassessment order on grounds of limitation.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 for AY 2012-13 were within the prescribed time limits, considering the amendments to Section 149 of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 148,Section 149,Section 153A,Section 153C
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal713 citing301 Taxmann 238 · 2024 · SC · Read judgment
- PCIT v. Ojjus Medicare (P) Ltd.277 citing161 Taxmann.com 160 · 2024 · HC
- KAD Housing Pvt Ltd. v. DCIT (15 citing469 ITR 32 · 2024 · HC
- Manju Somani v. ITO13 citing466 ITR 758 · 2024 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘B’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL
The captioned appeals are filed by Assessee and Revenue against the separate orders, all are dated 28.02.2025 passed by Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-30, New Delhi [‘Ld. CIT(A)' in short] u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ['the Act'] arising
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026