ACIT, CIRCLE-7(1),DELHI, DELHI vs. EBERSPAECHER SUETRAK BUS CLIMATE CONTROL SYSTEMS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, DELHI

ITA 3665/DEL/2025Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 February 2026AY 2014-1521 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The CIT(A) allowed the assessee to submit additional evidence, finding that the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause from producing them earlier. The CIT(A) then adjudicated the appeal on merits, deleting the ad-hoc disallowance of warranty provisions.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed a return declaring a loss, but the Assessing Officer (AO) made substantial additions under Section 68 for share capital and trade creditors, and disallowed various expenses and provisions due to non-compliance with notices. The assessee appealed, submitting additional evidence before the CIT(A).

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) was justified in admitting additional evidence and whether the disallowance of warranty provisions was sustainable.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 68,Section 144,Section 271(1)(c),Section 234B

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “F”, DELHI

Before: SHRI.RIFAUR RAHMAN & SHRI VIMAL KUMAR

For Appellant: Shri Ved Jain, Adv
For Respondent: Shri Aayush Garg, CA, Ms. Monika Singh, CIT-DR
Hearing: 19.01.2026Pronounced: 12.02.2026

PER S.RIFAUR RAHMAN,AM: The Revenue has filed appeal against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax, New Delhi [“Ld. CIT(A)”, for short]/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) dated 24.03.2025 for the Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed its return of income on 28.11.2014 declaring a loss of Rs.2,69,92,980/-. The case was selected for scrutiny through CASS. Accordingly, notices u/s. 143(2) and 142(1) of the Income Tax Act, of the Income Tax Act,1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') were issued; however, the same remained unserved upon the assessee. Several notices were thereafter issued and adjo

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 68

All 29,931 judgments and leading authorities on Section 68 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →