RAJESHVAR,GHAZIABAD vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, GHAZIABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the NFAC decided the issue ex-parte without adjudicating on merits, and similarly, the assessment orders were framed ex-parte. Therefore, to ensure justice and fair play, the appeals were restored to the file of the AO for de novo adjudication.
What were the facts?
The appeals were filed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) which confirmed additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) regarding credit entries in the bank account for which proper explanation of sources was not provided. The assessment orders and the NFAC's order were passed ex-parte.
What were the issues?
Whether the NFAC was justified in confirming the addition made by the AO for lack of proper explanation of bank entries, when the orders were passed ex-parte.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “E”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, HON’BLE & SHRI M. BALAGANESH
O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH, AM 1. These appeals in 7373 & 7374/Del/2025 for AYs 2015-16 to 2017-18, arises out of the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. CIT(A)’, in short] dated 27.10.2025 against the order of assessment passed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) dated 15.03.2022 by the Assessing Officer, NFAC, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. AO’). Identical issues are involved in all these appeals and hence they are taken up together and disposed of by this common order for the sake of convenience.
The only identical issue to be decided in all these appeals is as to whether the Learned NFAC was justified in confirming the addition made by the Learned AO in respect of credit entries in the bank account for want of proper explanation of sources in the facts and circumstances of the instant case.
We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. On perusal of the order of the Learned National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), we find that the Learned NFAC had decided the issue ex parte without adjudicating the issue on merits giving its independent finding. Further we find that even the assessment orders were framed exparte for all the years under consideration. Hence, in the interest of justice and fairplay we deem it fit and appropriate to restore this appeals to the file of Learned AO for de novo adjudication in accordance with law. Needless to mention that the assessee be given reasonable opportunity of being heard. The assessee is directed to cooperate with the Learned AO for expeditious disposal of the set aside assessment proceedings by not taking unwarranted adjournments. Hence, the grounds raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 16/02/2026.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026