DCIT, CIRCLE-73(1), DELHI vs. CANON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that CAM charges are not in the nature of rent but are contractual payments for services rendered. Therefore, TDS on such charges is deductible under Section 194C of the Income Tax Act at 2%, not under Section 194-I at 10%. The Tribunal relied on its previous decisions in similar cases.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order, which had reversed the Assessing Officer's (AO) finding that the assessee was in default for not deducting TDS on common area maintenance (CAM) charges. The AO had treated these charges as part of rent and liable for TDS under Section 194-I of the Income Tax Act.
What were the issues?
Whether common area maintenance (CAM) charges are to be treated as rent for TDS purposes (Section 194-I) or as contractual payments for services (Section 194C).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: “F” NEW DELHI
PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER This Revenue’s appeal for assessment year 2013-17, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), ADDL/JCIT(A)-1 [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Nagpur’s DIN and order No. ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-25/1070020673(1), dated 29.10.2024 involving proceedings under section 201(1)/201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). Heard both the parties. Case file perused.
It transpires that during the course of hearing that the Revenue/appellant herein seeks to reverse the CIT(A) action holding that the assessee is not liable to deduct TDS on a common maintenance charges “CAM” as per the Assessing Officer
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 201(1)
- M/S. Shree Laminators Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 4(4), KolkataITA 1534/KOL/2026[2011-2012]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2011-2012
- Tmw Fintech Private Limited, Mumbai vs Circle 14(1)(2), MumbaiITA 30/MUM/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- State Bank of India, Guna vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, GwaliorITA 432/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- State Bank of India Regional Business… vs Income Tax Officer, TDS Gwalior, GwaliorITA 420/AGR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- State Bank of India, Tikamgarh vs Income Tax Officer, TDS ITO (TDS) Gwalior…ITA 411/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026