ANIL CHAUDHARY,GHAZIABAD vs. ITO, WARD-72(5), NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the cash deposits were explained by the sale proceeds of the mother's inherited agricultural land. The mother had provided confirmation, an affidavit, and bank statements supporting the source of funds.
What were the facts?
The assessee's mother sold agricultural land and deposited cash into a joint bank account held with the assessee. The Assessing Officer made an addition of Rs. 10,35,000/- under Section 68, considering the cash deposits unexplained.
What were the issues?
Whether cash deposits in a joint bank account are unexplained income of the assessee when the source is claimed to be from the sale of land by the assessee's mother.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES “SMC” : DELHI
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA
ORDER The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the assessee against impugned order dated 28.4.2017, passed by Ld. CIT(Appeals) 32 New Delhi for the quantum of assessment passed u/s 143(3)/254 for the assessment year 2008-09.
The assessee is mainly aggrieved by addition of Rs. 10,35,000/- made u/s 68 on account of amounts deposited in the saving bank account of mother of the assessee Smt. Nirmala Chaudhary. This is a second round of proceedings in pursuance of order dated 12.7.2013, where by the ITAT directed the AO to adjudicate the issue afresh on the issue of cash deposits. Relevant observation of the Tribunal reads as under:- “8. We have heard the Ld. Departmental Representative and have gone through the material placed on record. We· find that assessee only once appeared before the Ld. Assessing Officer and explained the source of deposit of cash from sale. of agricultural
land held by his mother. The Assessing Officer observed that sale consideration was received through cheques, therefore, cash deposit was not explained. On further inquiry by Ld. Assessing Officer regarding cash deposit, assessee did not appear despite various notices. The Assessing Officer then observed that as per sale deed the assessee had received sale consideration through cheques and, therefore, cash deposited in Dena Bank was not explained with the sale of agricultural land and, therefore, he made the addition. The Ld. CIT (A) without making a finding of fact and without finding cash element in the sale deed deleted the addition on the basis of computation of income of his mother where the sale of agricultural land was declared. However, the question remained unanswered as to whether sale deed contained certain cash component also or not. The Ld. CIT (A) has not considered this aspect. Therefore, in the interest of justice, we are of the opinion that the case of assessee be re-adjudicated by Assessing Officer. Needless to say that necessary opportunity will be given to assessee of being heard.”
2. In the set-aside proceedings, ld. AO has again repeated the same addition on the ground that though the bank account is in the joint name assessee and his mother, who have the sold agricultural land for sum of Rs. 31 lacs. However, as per the Conveyance Deed executed on 25.3.2008, the sale consideration shown is only Rs. 7 lacs received through two crossed cheques. No sale deed in respect of the rest of the consideration of Rs. 24 lacs was filed.
In the first appellate proceedings Ld. CIT (A) too has confirmed the said addition holding that it has not been conclusively prove that assessee’s mother has earned Rs. 31 lacs from the sale of the land and from that source sum of Rs.10 lac was deposited which is not disclosed in the sale deed. Assessee being the first holder in joint account, the onus was upon the assessee to prove the cash deposit in the account.
Before us Ld. Counsel submitted that, first of all assessee’ mother is separately assessed to tax having PAN and before the authorities below she has filed a confirmation that she had sold agricultural land belonging to her father and received money from sale of cash which has been deposited to joint account in the bank wherein she has joint account holder of her son. She has also filed an affidavit deposing on oath the said transaction. Further, in support the copy of her income tax return was filed and our attention was drawn towards her bank account in Dena Bank and Nainital Bank, wherein sale proceeds of land has been deposited in her various bank accounts. Further in support, he has drawn our attention to all her bank statements wherein similar cash has been deposited in March, 2008. Thus, no addition could have been made in the hands of the assessee. Further assessee had also filed a valuation report wherein the fair market value of the land sold has been valued at Rs. 40 lacs admeasuring 641.26 sq. mt. and once it has been stated by assessee’s mother that she has sold land for Rs. 31 lacs and also produced entire passbooks, then no addition should have been made in the case of the assessee.
On the other hand Ld. DR strongly relied upon the order of the Ld. CIT (A).
From the perusal of the relevant findings given in the impugned orders as well as material referred to before me at the time of hearing, I find that right from first stage itself, assessee has been contending that the cash deposited in the bank account was from the sale proceeds of land sold by his mother which belonged to her by way of inheritance and is separately assessed to tax. She has duly given her confirmation to the AO along with sworn affidavit clearly stating that all the transactions during the period 1.4.2007 to 31.3.2008 belongs to her and does not have any relation with her son. She sold a piece of land inherited by her from her father which she deposited in various bank accounts details of which are as under :-
S.No. S. No Amount Cash/ Bank (Rs.) Cheque 1 26/03/2008 10,00,000.00 Cash Dena Bank Account No. 8060, 2 03/04/2008 2,00,000.00 Cash Dena Bank Account No. 8060, 3 25/03/2008 5,00,000.00 Cash The Nainital Bank Ltd. Account No. 2001185 4 25/03/2008 2,00,000.00 Cash The Nainital Bank Ltd. Account No. 2001185 5 27/03/2008 3,50,000.00 Cheque The Nainital Bank Ltd. Account No. 2001185 6 25/03/2008 5,00,000.00 Cash The Union Bank of India Account No. 411602010002376 7 26/03/2008 3,50,000.00 Cheque The Union Bank of India Account No. 411602010002376 Total Consideration Received 31,00,000.00
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026