ADVENTITY GLOBAL SERVICES PVT. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT 12 (1)(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the ex-parte order passed by the CIT(A) and restored the matter back for fresh adjudication. The assessee was granted one more opportunity to present its case.
What were the facts?
The assessee did not appear before the CIT(A) due to a notice sent to a wrong address, resulting in an ex-parte order. The assessee challenged this order, claiming insufficient opportunity for hearing.
What were the issues?
Whether an ex-parte order passed by the CIT(A) is valid when the notice was sent to a wrong address and the assessee was not given sufficient opportunity to be heard.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A”
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD, JM & SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, AM
आदेशकीप्रनिनिनिअग्रेनर्ि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथी/ The Appellant प्रत्यथी/ The Respondent 2. 3. आयकरआयुक्त(अपील) / The CIT(A) 4. आयकरआयुक्त/ CIT- concerned यवभागीयप्रयतयनयि, आयकरअपीलीयअयिकरण, मुंबई/ DR, ITAT, 5.
M/s Adventity Global Services Pvt. Ltd.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026