ITO, WARD-2(1), NOIDA vs. LILA RAM, G B NAGAR
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the tax effect of the appeal was below the prescribed monetary limit for filing appeals by the Department as per CBDT Circular No. 03/2008. Therefore, the appeal was not maintainable.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order of the CIT(A) for AY 2009-10. The total income assessed by the Assessing Officer was Rs. 10,51,000.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable before the ITAT considering the low tax effect in light of the CBDT circular.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “SMC”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA
The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the Revenue against the impugned order dated 31.05.2018 passed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-I, NOIDA for the Assessment Year 2009-10.
Admittedly, the total income assessed by the Assessing Officer is Rs.10,51,000/- on which tax effect is much below the new prescribed monetary limit for filing of appeal by the Department before the ITAT of Rs.20 lac vide CBDT Circular No. 03/2008 [F.No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ (Pt)] dated 11th July, 2018. Accordingly, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed as non maintainable because of low tax effect.
In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 28th January, 2019
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026