ITO, WARD- 2(4), NOIDA vs. PRADEEP TAYAL, GAUTAM BUDH NAGAR
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the tax effect of the appeal was below the prescribed monetary limit for filing appeals by the Department. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as not maintainable.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order of the CIT(A). The total income assessed by the Assessing Officer was Rs. 25,82,000/-.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the Revenue's appeal was maintainable before the ITAT given the low tax effect, as per CBDT circulars.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “SMC”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA
The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the Revenue against the impugned order dated 30.05.2018 passed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-I, NOIDA for the Assessment Year 2009-10.
Admittedly, the total income assessed by the Assessing Officer is Rs.25,82,000/- on which tax effect is much below the new prescribed monetary limit for filing of appeal by the Department before the ITAT of Rs.20 lac vide CBDT Circular No. 03/2008 [F.No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ (Pt)] dated 11th July, 2018. Accordingly, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed as non maintainable because of low tax effect.
In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 28th January, 2019
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026