ITO, WARD-2(4), NOIDA vs. PARMANAND SHARMA, G B NAGAR
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the tax effect of the appeal was below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT Circular No. 03/2008 for filing appeals. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as not maintainable.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2009-10. The assessed income was Rs. 15,00,000.
What were the issues?
Maintainability of the Revenue's appeal due to low tax effect.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Not Applicable
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “SMC”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA
The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the Revenue against the impugned order dated 30.05.2018 passed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-I, NOIDA for the Assessment Year 2009-10.
Admittedly, the total income assessed by the Assessing Officer is Rs.15,00,000/- on which tax effect is much below the new prescribed monetary limit for filing of appeal by the Department before the ITAT of Rs.20 lac vide CBDT Circular No. 03/2008 [F.No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ (Pt)] dated 11th July, 2018. Accordingly, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed as non maintainable because of low tax effect.
In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 28th January, 2019
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026