BHARAT BHUSHAN JAIN CHARITABLE TRUST,NEW DELHI vs. CIT(E), NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the rejection of the application by the CIT(E) was not sustainable. Since the assessee had already been granted registration under Section 12A, indicating satisfaction with its charitable objects and activities, the denial of 80G approval was unwarranted.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable trust, applied for approval under Section 80G(5)(vi) of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(E) rejected the application, finding it premature as the trust had only made one donation and had not conducted substantial charitable activities since its inception in 2012.
What were the issues?
Whether the denial of 80G approval is justified when the trust has already obtained 12A registration and has conducted some charitable activities, even if limited.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Sonepat Hindu Educational and Charitable Society v. CIT26 citing278 ITR 262 · 2005 · HC
- CIT (E) v. Sant Girdhar Anand Parmhans Sant Ashram3 citing408 ITR 79 · 2018 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES “A” : DELHI
Before: SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M. & SHRI L.P. SAHU, A.M.
Shri C.S. Aggarwal, Sr. Advocate, And For Assessee : Shri D.B. Jain, C.A. For Revenue : Shri Sanjay Goyal, CIT-D.R. Date of Hearing : 07.02.2019 Date of Pronouncement : 12.02.2019 ORDER PER BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M. This appeal by assessee has been directed against the order of the Ld. CIT(E), New Delhi, Dated 27th/28th December 2017, rejecting the application for approval under section 80G(5)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Briefly the facts of the case are that assessee filed the application seeking for approval/exemption under 2 ITA.No.750/Del./2018 Bharat Bhushan Charitable Trust, New Delhi. section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee filed the submissions and details to Ld.CIT(E) in respect of application filed for registration under section 12A as well as exemption under section 80G of the Income-Tax Act, 1961. The Ld.CIT(E) found that assessee has failed to provide any cogent proof that could verify that the assessee is actually carrying-out the activities in pursuance of the objects set forth in the Trust Deed. The Assessee-Trust which came into existence in 2012, had sufficient opportunity at hand to carry-out charitable activities during the period but except for a donation given to “Kanya Gurukul Mahavidyalaya” nothing substantial or concrete has been done by the assessee in the field of charity. The lack of charitable activities conducted by the assessee clearly shows that the assessee has remained dormant all this time. The Ld.CIT(E), therefore, found the application of assessee to be premature and the same was accordingly rejected.
3. Learned Counsel for the Assessee reiterated the submissions made before the Ld.CIT(E). He has submitted
3 ITA.No.750/Del./2018 Bharat Bhushan Charitable Trust, New Delhi. that assessee had came into existence under Trust Deed with the only object to carry-out the charitable activities in accordance with its objects as have been set-out in the Trust Deed, Dated 1st April 2012 and has not been found to have carried-out any activity which is contrary to the objects of the Trust. It is to be seen whether the objects of the Trust seeking approval under section 80G is for charitable purpose. He has submitted that there is no denying of the fact that assessee has given donation to “Kanya Gurukul Mahavidyalaya”, copy of which is filed at pages 50 and 51 of the paperwork, which is also approved under section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Apart from this, it was stated that during the year, assessee has also been allowed to use the premises at Ansari Road, Daryaganj, for carrying-out its charitable activities. He has submitted that assessee in the absence of approval under section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has not been able to receive any donation and as such it would not carry-out charitable activities to achieve its objects. He has submitted that the Ld.CIT(E), Delhi, has granted registration under 4 ITA.No.750/Del./2018 Bharat Bhushan Charitable Trust, New Delhi. section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, vide Order Dated 28th December, 2017 in which it is clearly provided that Ld. CIT(E) is satisfied about the genuineness of the activities promised or claimed to be carried-out for the relevant financial year. He has, therefore, submitted that since the assessee has carried-out charitable activities and that conditions of Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, have not been doubted by the Ld.CIT(E), therefore, assessee is entitled for approval under Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. He has relied upon order of the Tribunal in the case of Sikshan Prasarak Mandali vs CIT (2008) 117 TTJ (Pune) 337.
4. On the other hand, Ld. D.R. relied upon the impugned order.
5. After considering the rival submissions, we are of the view that impugned order cannot be sustained in law. It is not in dispute that assessee has been granting registration under section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, vide Order Dated 28th December, 2017, meaning thereby,
5 ITA.No.750/Del./2018 Bharat Bhushan Charitable Trust, New Delhi. Ld.CIT(E) was satisfied about the charitable activities carried-out by the assessee and the objects of the assessee are charitable in nature. The Ld. CIT(E) has not disputed that assessee has satisfied the conditions of Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax, 1961. It is also not in dispute that assessee has carried-out some of the charitable activities in furtherance to its objects. Therefore, there was no basis for Ld.CIT(E) to reject the application under section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. We may note that the ITAT, Delhi A-Bench, Delhi in the case of Bharat Vikas Parishad Maharana Pratap Nyas, Gurgaon, Haryana vs., CIT (Exemptions) (Hq.), Chandigarh in ITA.No.6487/Del./2018 vide order Dated 6th February 2019 on similar circumstances has allowed the exemption/ approval under Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Order of the Tribunal is reproduced as under :
“IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES “A” : DELHI BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M. AND SHRI L.P. SAHU, A.M. ITA.No.6487/Del./2018
6 ITA.No.750/Del./2018 Bharat Bhushan Charitable Trust, New Delhi. Bharat Vikas Parishad Maharana Pratap Nyas, Flat No.157, Hewo Apartments, The CIT (Exemptions) vs. Sector-15, Part-II, Gurgaon, Haryana. (Hq.), Chandigarh. PAN AADTB1479P (Appellant) (Respondent)
Shri Ved Jain, Advocate, Shri Rishabh Jain, C.A. And For Assessee : Miss. Umang Luthra, Advocate For Revenue : Shri Sanjay Goyal, CIT-D.R. Date of Hearing : 04.02.2019 Date of Pronouncement : 06.02.2019 ORDER PER BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M.
This appeal by Assessee has been directed against the Order of the Ld. CIT(E), Chandigarh, Dated 29.08.2018, under section 80G(5)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. We have heard the Learned Representatives of both the parties and perused the material available on record.
7 ITA.No.750/Del./2018 Bharat Bhushan Charitable Trust, New Delhi. “3. Briefly the facts of the case are that an application in the prescribed form was filed for approval under section 80G(5)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Ld. CIT(E) noted that in this case the applicant also filed an application under section 12A of the I.T. Act did not meet the requirement for approval as mandated by Rule 11AA of the I.T. Rules. Even though, the applicant has been granted registration under section 12A recently, the real purpose as per the stated object cannot be corroborated at present given that the entity is still to redeem itself after the grant of 12A registration. The application was found premature and the same was rejected.
Learned Counsel for the Assessee submitted that assessee is a charitable trust and carried out various activities since inception like providing free mortuary vans free of cost to Civil Hospitals, providing free foods to the patients of civil hospitals, free water ATMs etc. The Ld. CIT(E) granted registration under section 12AA vide Order Dated 29.08.2018 (PB-55) but 8 ITA.No.750/Del./2018 Bharat Bhushan Charitable Trust, New Delhi. declined to grant approval under section 80G of the I.T. Act, 1961. He has relied upon decision of Hon’ble jurisdictional Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of CIT (E) vs. Sant Girdhar Anand Parmhans Sant Ashram (2018) 408 ITR 79 (P & H) in which it was held as under :
“It was recorded by the Tribunal that since assessee had been granted exemption u/s 12AA which was in existence and in case of any violation, the same was subject to variation/withdrawal by the CIT(E), there was no logic in denying approval u/s 80G(5)(vi) of the Act. There seems no reason to differ with the view taken by the Tribunal. In case, in subsequent years, the Revenue is satisfied that the activities of assessee are not qualified for charitable purposes, it shall be open for the Department to initiate action for cancellation of registration u/s 12AA and also for passing
9 ITA.No.750/Del./2018 Bharat Bhushan Charitable Trust, New Delhi. appropriate orders regarding approval granted u/s 80G(5)(vi) in accordance with law.”
3.1. He has also relied upon similar decision of Hon’ble jurisdictional Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of Sonepat Hindu Educational and Charitable Society vs. CIT (2005) 278 ITR 262 (P & H) in which it was held that registration of an institution under section 12A of the Act is sufficient to of its being established for charitable purposes. Thus, registration under section 80G cannot be denied. He has also relied upon decision of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of DIT vs. Foundation of Ophthalmic & Optometry Research Education Centre 2012 (8) TMI 77 (Del.) in which it was held as under :
“Denial of registration as charitable trust under Section-12AA (1)(B) - no charitable activity had in fact taken place since the society was a newly established one - Held that:- Considering the procedure for registration as lead in Section 12AA
10 ITA.No.750/Del./2018 Bharat Bhushan Charitable Trust, New Delhi. the statute does not prohibit or enjoin the Commissioner from registering Trust solely based on its objects, without any activity, in the case of a newly registered Trust. The statute does not prescribe a waiting period, for a trust to qualify itself for registration.
When the society/trust of assessee itself was formed on 30.05.2008 with the money available with the trust, one cannot expect them to do activity of charity immediately and because of that situation the authority cannot come to a conclusion that trust was not intending to do any activity of charity. In such a situation the objects of the trust have to be taken into consideration by the authority and the objects of the trust could be read from the trust deed itself - in favour of the assessee.”
11 ITA.No.750/Del./2018 Bharat Bhushan Charitable Trust, New Delhi. 3.2. He has submitted that while granting approval under section 80G, the Commissioner is required to satisfy the prescribed conditions which he has not doubted in the present case. He has, therefore, submitted that approval under section 80G may be granted to the assessee.
On the other hand, Ld. D.R. relied upon the impugned Order.
After considering the rival submissions, we are of the view that Order under section 80G(5) denying approval to the assessee cannot be sustained in Law. It is not in dispute that assessee has been granted registration under section 12AA of the I.T. Act, 1961, by DIT (E) vide Order Dated 29.09.2018. The Ld. CIT(E) was satisfied with the objects and activities of the assessee that it is meant for charitable purposes, therefore, different view cannot be taken while refusing the grant of approval under section 80G(5) of the I.T. Act. The Ld. CIT(E) did not doubt the objects of the assessee and did not mention anything if assessee has 12 ITA.No.750/Del./2018 Bharat Bhushan Charitable Trust, New Delhi. violated any of the conditions of Section 80G(5) of the I.T. Act. Considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case in the light of above decisions relied upon by the Learned Counsel for the Assessee, we are of the view that assessee is entitled for approval under section 80G(5) of the I.T. Act, 1961, from the date of application. We, accordingly, set aside the impugned Order and direct the Ld. CIT(E), Chandigarh, to grant approval to the assessee under section 80G(5)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, from the date of application.
6. In the result, appeal of Assessee is allowed.”
5.1. In view of the above following the order of the Tribunal in the case of BVP (supra), we set aside the impugned order and direct the Ld. CIT(E), New Delhi, to grant approval/exemption to the assessee under Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, from the date of application.
In the result, appeal of Assessee is allowed.
13 ITA.No.750/Del./2018 Bharat Bhushan Charitable Trust, New Delhi.
Order pronounced in the open Court.
Similar judgments
Other orders that rely on the same authority or decide the same section.
- Vision Divyang Foundation, New Delhi vs CIT(E), New DelhiDelhi20 Feb 2023Allowed
Also relies on Sonepat Hindu Educational and Charitable Society v. CIT
The Tribunal held that the rejection was arbitrary, especially since the assessee had already been granted registration under Section 12AA on the same date. It was also noted that approval was granted for subsequent year...
- Khagol Mandal, Mumbai vs D.I.T. (Exemption), MumbaiMumbai7 Jun 2019Allowed
Also relies on Sonepat Hindu Educational and Charitable Society v. CIT
The Tribunal held that the Director's perception of no expenditure was factually incorrect, citing publications and activities of the trust. The Tribunal found the Director's reliance on various case laws to be misplaced...
- Bharat Vikas Parishad Maharana Pratap Nyas… vs CIT(Exemption) Hqtr., ChandigarhDelhi6 Feb 2019Allowed
Also relies on Sonepat Hindu Educational and Charitable Society v. CIT
The Tribunal held that since the assessee had already been granted registration under section 12AA, the denial of approval under section 80G was unsustainable. The CIT(E)'s satisfaction with the objects and activities fo...
- Sanjivani Foundation, Ahmednagar vs Commissioner of Income-Tax:1Pune10 Jan 2018Allowed
Also relies on Sonepat Hindu Educational and Charitable Society v. CIT
The Tribunal held that registration under Section 12A is sufficient proof of charitable purpose and that issues regarding application of income should be examined by the AO during assessment. The CIT was not justified in...
- S.J.A. Alumni Association, Dehradun vs CIT, DehradunDelhi1 Feb 2016Allowed
Also relies on Sonepat Hindu Educational and Charitable Society v. CIT
The Tribunal held that the rejection order was barred by limitation as it was passed beyond the prescribed six months. It further held that since the assessee's registration under Section 12A was subsisting and not withd...
More judgments on Section 80G(5)(vi)
- Samvedna Foundation Trust, Agra vs ITO, Ward Exemption, AgraITA 496/AGR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Sri Vrindavana Gokula Charitable Trust… vs CIT (Exemptions), BengaluruITA 1554/BANG/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2026-27
- Creative Foundation, Nandurbar vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions)…ITA 1502/PUN/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2026-27
- Ladali Goshala Seva Sanstha, Daund vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), PuneITA 641/PUN/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2025-2026
- The Pyramid Spiritual Trust (Hyderabad)… vs ITO (Exemption) Ward 1(3), HyderabadITA 346/HYD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed2 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sahoo Supply Agency,Balasore vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs,New DelhiOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Jyoti Consultants, Agrahat vs. Pr. Commissioner GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, BhubaneswarOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Sahoo Supply Agency vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And CustomsOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- Gopal Aromatic PVT. LTD., Cuttack vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Nourangi Paints vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026