M/S COSMIQUE LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO TDS, NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee's Director filed an application to withdraw the appeals, citing High Court decisions on the validity of Section 234E and late fees. The Tribunal accepted the withdrawal application.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed three appeals against a common order of the CIT(A) concerning AY 2013-14. The appeals were listed for hearing on 13.02.2019.
What were the issues?
The appeals concerned the imposition of late fees for late filing of TDS returns under Section 234E and the legality of orders passed under Section 200A for levying such fees.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI ‘B’ BENCH,
Before: SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA, & SMT BEENA A. PILLAI
Heard together (3 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
ORDER PER BENCH :
The above three appeals by the assessee are preferred against the common order of the ld. CIT(A) – 41, New Delhi dated 13.07.2016 pertaining to A.Y 2013-14.
The Director of the company has filed an application dated 13.02.2019 stating as under:
“Above noted appeals are fixed for today. Imposing of late fee for late filing of TDS return u/s 234E of IT Act. In this respect submit Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court in the case of M/s Dundlod Shikshan Santhan Vs Union Of India.
Followed the decision of High Court of Bombay in the case of Rasmikant Kundalia and upheld the constitutional validity of section 234E and has also decided the issue of legality of orders passed under section 200A levying late filing fees u/s 234E prior to 01.06.2015.
In reference of above decision by the Hon'ble High Courts, which is followed by the ITAT, I withdraw the appeals or if the Appellant Tribunal consider late filling fees charge u/s 234E after with effect from 01.06.2015 may pass appropriate order. I hereby authorized Shr. Ashok Kumar Dubey to appear of my behalf and submit the application.”
In view of the above, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeals of the assessee in to 5490/DEL/2016 stand dismissed.
The order is pronounced in the open court on 13.02.2019.
More judgments on Section 234E
- Mulchand Ramkishan Laddha, Pune vs Income Tax Officer (TDS-2), PuneITA 874/PUN/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2669/PUN/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2668/PUN/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2667/PUN/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2666/PUN/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026