DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. VAMSEE KRISHNA KUPPANNAGARI, PARVATHIPURAM
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed all six appeals filed by the Revenue, ruling them not maintainable due to the low tax effect as per CBDT Circular No.17/2019 and a clarifying letter. Consequently, the assessee's cross-objections for the same assessment years were also dismissed as infructuous.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed six appeals against orders of the CIT(A) for assessment years 2012-13 to 2018-19, with the assessee filing corresponding cross-objections. The Departmental Representative requested to withdraw the Revenue's appeals as the tax effect in each case was below the Rs. 50 Lakhs monetary limit stipulated by CBDT Circular No.17/2019.
What were the issues?
Whether appeals filed by the Revenue are maintainable if the tax effect is below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars, and the consequential impact on the assessee's cross-objections.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM “DIVN” BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO, HON’BLE & SHRI S BALAKRISHNAN, HON’BLE
Sl ITA No. Asst. Date of DIN & Order No. Arising out of no Year order order U/s. 1. 57/Viz/2025 2013-14 26/11/2024 ITBA/APL/S/250/2024- 147 25/1070656240(1) 2. 58/Viz/2025 2012-13 26/11/2024 ITBA/APL/S/250/2024- 143(3) 25/1070656608(1) r.w.s 147 3. 59/Viz/2025 2014-15 26/11/2024 ITBA/APL/S/250/2024- 147 25/10706565521(1) 4. 60/Viz/2025 2015-16 26/11/2024 ITBA/APL/S/250/2024- 147 25/1070656354(1) 5. 61/Viz/2025 2016-17 26/11/2024 ITBA/APL/S/250/2024- 147 25/1070656473(1) 6. 62/Viz/2025 2018-19 27/11/2024 ITBA/APL/S/250/2024- 147 25/1070693116 (1)
The assessee has also raised Cross Objections (C.O. Nos.9, 10, 11, 12, 13 & 14/Viz/2025). Since the Revenue’s appeals and Cross Objections are connected and pertain to the same assessee, all these appeals and the COs are clubbed, heard together and disposed of in this consolidated order.
At the outset, the Ld. Departmental Representative submitted before us that all the six appeals filed by the Revenue may be permitted to be withdrawn as the tax effect involved in these cases is 3 below Rs.50 Lakhs. The Ld. AR did not object to the submission of the Ld. DR.
The CBDT vide Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 has revised the monetary limit for filing the appeals before the Tribunal to Rs.50 Lakhs. Further, CBDT vide letter dated 20.08.2019 has also clarified that Circular No.17/2019 would be applicable to all pending appeals. In such circumstances, the present appeals filed by the Revenue are not maintainable considering the low tax effect involved therein. It is ordered accordingly and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed with a liberty to the Department to file a Miscellaneous Application before the Tribunal for recalling the order, if the requisite material is brought in to show that the appeal is protected by the exceptions prescribed in para-10 of the Circular dated 11.07.2018.
In the result, all the six appeals of the Revenue are dismissed.
Since the Revenue’s appeals for the AYs 2013-14, 2012-13, 2014- 15, 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2018-19 are dismissed as not maintainable considering the low tax effect, the adjudication of Cross Objections filed by the assessee in the respective Assessment Years becomes infructuous. Accordingly, the Cross Objections filed by the assessee are dismissed.
In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and the Cross Objections filed by the assessee are dismissed.
Pronounced in the open Court on 08th April, 2025.
Sd/- Sd/- (S. BALAKRISHNAN ) (V. DURGA RAO) लेखा सद�य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER �याियकसद�य/JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated :08/04/2025 OKK - SPS आदेश क� �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/Copy of the order forwarded to:- िनधा�रती/ The Assessee – Vamsee Krishna Kuppannagari, 2-7-73, 1. Sri Venkateswara Colony, Rayagada Board, Pravathipuram, Andhra Pradesh – 535501. राज�व/The Revenue – DCIT, Central Circle-3, 5th Floor, Direct Taxes 2. Building, MVP Colony, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh-530017.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ayush Bamaniya vs. State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Secretary Ministry Of Home AffairsMadhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Patidar vs. Bank Of INDIAMadhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
- Ritik vs. State Of M.P.Madhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
- Lokesh vs. Bank Of Maharashtra Through Branch ManagerMadhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
- Arvind Lunawat vs. Axis Bank LimitedMadhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026