ST JOHN ANTONY FARINA EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE SOCIETY,GUNTUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTIONS WARD, GUNTUR
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Ld. CIT(E) had not properly discussed the documentary evidence submitted by the assessee and had casually observed that the charitable activities were not justified. The Tribunal found that the assessee was carrying out its stated objectives of imparting education and providing relief to the poor.
What were the facts?
The assessee, St. John Antony Farina Educational And Charitable Society, filed an appeal against the rejection order by the Ld. CIT(E) for renewal of registration under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee's application was rejected on the grounds that its charitable activities were not justified with verifiable documentary evidence.
What were the issues?
Rejection of renewal of registration under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, without proper consideration of documentary evidence.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM “DIVISION” BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI VEERAVALLI DURGA RAO, HON’BLE & SHRI S BALAKRISHNAN, HON’BLE
आदेश /O R D E R
PER SHRI S BALAKRISHNAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the rejection order of Ld.Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Hyderabad [hereinafter in short “Ld. CIT(E)”] in Form 10AD dated 31.03.2025 for the renewal of I.T.A.No.246/VIZ/2025 St. John Antony Farina Educational And Charitable Society Registration under section 12AB of Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter in short “the Act”] which was made by the assessee in the Form No. 10AB on 13.08.2024.
Aggrieved by the rejection order, assessee filed an appeal before us. The only issue as emanating from the grounds of appeal is with respect to rejection of Registration under section 12AB of the Act.
At the outset, Ld. Authorized Representative (hereinafter in short “Ld.AR”] submitted that Ld. CIT(E) has not passed a speaking order for the denial of registration to the assessee’s society. He further submitted that various documentary evidences have been provided before Ld. CIT(E) but he has casually observed the charitable activities are not justified. He therefore pleaded that renewal of registration to be granted to the assessee.
On the other hand, Ld. Departmental Representative [hereinafter in short “Ld. DR”] heavily relied on the order of the Ld. CIT(E).
We have heard both the sides and perused the material available on record. Assessee being an educational and charitable society registered under the Andhra Pradesh Societies Registration Act, 2001 vide Registration No. 227 of 2019 dated 29.07.2019 with the objective of imparting education and relief to the poor. Assessee is running an English medium school at Vykuntapuram, Amaravathi Mandal, Guntur and Old Age home at Page No. 2
I.T.A.No.246/VIZ/2025 St. John Antony Farina Educational And Charitable Society Kuchipudi, Tenali, Guntur. Consequent to the amendment in section 12AB of the Act, assessee applied for renewal of Registration under section 12AB of the Act on 13.08.2024 by filing Form 10AB. The assessee responded to the notices issued by the Ld. CIT(E) but it is observed from the order of the Ld.CIT(E) that the assessee has partly responded. However, it was demonstrated by the Ld.AR that the assessee fully responded to the notices issued by Ld. CIT(E) as detailed in paper book submitted by the assessee. We find that Ld. CIT(E) while rejecting the application in Form10AB for the purpose of Registration of the society under section 12AB of the Act has observed as follows: -
“3. On perusal of the submissions made by the assessee, it is observed that the charitable activities are not justified with verifiable documentary evidence which is in violation of the provisions of the section 12AB of the IT Act, 1961. The assessee obtained regular registration u/s 12AB in form 10AD dated 26.09.2022 valid from AY 2021-22 to AY 2025-26. The assessee further made application in form 10AB on13.08.2024 for renewal of registration u/s.12AB. In view of the above, the present application in form 10AB for renewal registration u/s 12AB is herewith rejected.”
On a perusal of the Ld. CIT(E) order, we find that he has not discussed anything except stating that the charitable activities are not justified with verifiable documentary evidence. We have also perused the documents submitted by the assessee and we find that the assessee is carrying its activities according to the objects viz., imparting education and relief of the poor. The Ld.CIT(E) has casually observed that no charitable activities have been carried out without discussing anything about the details and record filed by the Page No. 3
I.T.A.No.246/VIZ/2025 St. John Antony Farina Educational And Charitable Society assessee. On further perusal of the details submitted by the assessee, we are unable to understand which activities of the assessee Society are contrary to the objects of the Society. We find that the accounts of the society are audited and relevant documents are filed in the paper book filed before us. In spite of the above, the Ld. CIT (E) has simply rejected the assessee’s application which, in our considered opinion is not correct. On a perusal of the objectives of the society, we are of the opinion that the assessee is carrying out the charitable activities and is entitled for Registration under section 12AB of the Act. Therefore, we are of the opinion that it is a fit case to grant Registration under section 12AB of the Act. Accordingly, in the facts and circumstances of the case as discussed above, the impugned order of the Ld.CIT(E) is set aside and we direct the Ld.CIT (E) to grant registration to the assessee under section12AB of the Act. Accordingly, grounds raised by the assessee are allowed.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 09th June,2025.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026