KEDAR EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,GURUGRAM vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the assessee-society already had registration under section 12AA, its objects were considered charitable. The CIT(E)'s reasons for rejection, particularly the lack of donations before 80G approval, were not considered valid.
What were the facts?
The assessee-society applied for approval under section 80G(5)(vi) of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(E) rejected the application, noting that no activities had been carried out towards the stated objects and no donations were received.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) was justified in rejecting the 80G approval application based on the lack of activities and donations, despite the assessee having 12AA registration.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES “D”: DELHI
Before: SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI & SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI
PER BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M. This appeal by Assessee-Society has been directed against the Order of the Ld. CIT(E), Chandigarh, Dated 31.10.2018 rejecting the application or approval under section 80G(5)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
The facts of the case are that assessee filed an application in prescribed form for approval under section 2 ITA.No.7709/Del./2018 Kedar Educational Society, Gurugram.
80G of the I.T. Act, 1961. In this case, registration under section 12AA of the I.T. Act, 1961 has been granted to the assessee-society vide Order dated 29th March, 2018. The Ld. CIT(E) called for several details/clarifications with regard to approval under section 80G of the I.T. Act. The assessee filed reply as well as details before him, which reveal that no activity have been carried-out by the assessee-society towards the stated objects. Further, the assessee failed to provide instance of any donations received by the society. The Ld. CIT(E) in the absence of any activity, the real purpose for which the society was incorporated remain unverifiable. The application for approval was accordingly rejected.
After considering the rival submissions, we are of the view that the matter requires reconsideration at the level of the Ld. CIT(E). It is not in dispute that assessee-society has been granted registration under section 12AA of the I.T. Act, 1961 considering it to be charitable society. The Ld. CIT(E) while granting the registration under section 12AA of the I.T. Act found that the objects of the assessee-society
3 ITA.No.7709/Del./2018 Kedar Educational Society, Gurugram. are genuine and carrying on charitable activities. Learned Counsel for the Assessee submitted that assessee is an Educational Society, which by itself is a charitable activity and that detailed reply and evidences were filed before the Ld. CIT(E) to show that assessee-society carrying-out the charitable activities. Since the assessee-society has been granted registration under section 12AA of the I.T. Act, therefore, it is an admitted fact that assessee is established for charitable purposes having the objects which are charitable in nature. Therefore, even if no activity have been carried out by the assessee-society towards its objects, it would not make the assessee-society disentitle for approval under section 80G of the I.T. Act. However, Learned Counsel for the Assessee submitted that assessee-society is carrying out certain charitable activities, which have not been examined by the Ld. CIT(E). Therefore, the matter requires reconsideration at the level of the Ld. CIT(E). Further, the Ld. CIT(E) is not justified in holding that assessee-society failed to produce the instance of any donation received by the society because unless the assessee-society is granted
4 ITA.No.7709/Del./2018 Kedar Educational Society, Gurugram. approval under section 80G(5) of the I.T. Act, 1961, nobody will provide donation to the assessee-society. Therefore, it may not be a relevant reason to reject the application of the assessee-society. In this view of the matter, we set aside the impugned order and restore the matter in issue to the file of the Ld. CIT(E), Chandigarh with a direction to re-decide the matter in issue in the light of the above observations and in the light of material produced on record by the assessee society, by giving reasonable, sufficient opportunity of being heard to the assessee-society. Accordingly, appeal of Assessee-Society is allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, appeal of Assessee allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open Court.
More judgments on Section 80G
- Savan Dayalal Ladani, Rajkot vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-2(1)…ITA 575/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pareshbhai Savjibhai Khunt, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 2(2)(3), RajkotITA 842/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026