ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE- 6(3)(1), BANGALORE vs. SRI. M. KIRAN KUMAR, BANGALORE
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeal was not maintainable due to low tax effect as per the CBDT circular. The circular is also applicable to pending cases.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(Appeals). The tax effect in the appeal was below Rs. 50 lakhs, which is the threshold specified by CBDT Circular No. 17/2019.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable before the Tribunal when the tax effect is below the threshold specified by the CBDT circular.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH, BENGALURU
O R D E R
Per PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JM :
The Revenue has filed an appeal against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Bangalore-6, Bangalore passed u/s. 143(3) and 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
At the time of hearing, it was brought to the knowledge of the Bench the tax effect in the appeal is below Rs.50 lakhs therefore covered by CBDT Circular No.17/2019 Dt.8.8.2019. We find as per the CBDT Circular No.17/2019 Dt.8.8.2019, no appeal shall be filed by the Revenue before the Tribunal where the tax effect is below Rs.50 lakhs. In the present case, the Page 2 of 2 Assessing Officer has raised a demand under Section 143(3) vide order dt.13.12.2017 of Rs.36,84,517/- (excluding interestwhich is not disputed and the learned CIT (Appeals) has granted relief. Further the Circular of the CBDT is also applicable to the pending cases. Accordingly, the tax demand raised by the Revenue authorities is below Rs.50 lakhs and circular is applicable to the pending appeals. Hence, we dismiss the Revenue’s appeal on maintainability and low tax effect.
Order pronounced in the open court on 19th November, 2019.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026