SANJAY GUPTA,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CIRCLE-14(1), NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee sought permission to withdraw the appeal as it was wrongly filed. The Revenue had no objection to the withdrawal. The Tribunal granted permission to withdraw the appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 263 of the Act. At the outset of the hearing, the assessee's representative stated that the appeal was wrongly filed.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the assessee was maintainable and if withdrawal of the appeal should be permitted.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘G’ NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI G.D. AGRAWAL & SHRI K.NARASIMHA CHARY
Assessee by Sh Akshat Jain, CA, Sh Rajat Jain, CA Revenue by Mrs. NainaSoin Kapil, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 03.05.2019 Date of Pronouncement 03.05.2019 ORDER PER K. NARASIMHA CHARY, J.M. This is an appeal by the Assessee against the orders dated 24/1/passed by the transfer Commissioner of income tax, Delhi-5 under section 263 of the Act.
At the outset, learned AR filed a memo stating that the appeal was wrongly filed and therefore the appellant/assessee desires to withdraw the same and sought the permission of the Tribunal.
Learned DR reports no objection to permit the withdrawal. Recording the same, we dismiss the appeal as withdrawn.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 03rd May, 2019.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026