M/S. VIMALALAYA HOSPITAL TRUST,BANGALORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the denial of 80G registration was not sustainable in law. Since the assessee had a valid 12AA registration and no violations were established, the CIT(A) should have considered the application.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Vimalalaya Hospital Trust, applied for recognition under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(A) rejected the application, despite the assessee having valid registration under Section 12AA.
What were the issues?
Whether the denial of Section 80G recognition is justified when the assessee possesses a valid Section 12AA registration and no violations are proven.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES : “B”, BANGALORE
Before: SHRI B.R.BASKARAN & SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICAL MEMBER
PER SMT BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER: Present appeal has been filed by assessee against order dated 29/04/19 passed by Ld. CIT (A), Bangalore for assessment year 2017-18 to 2019-20 under section 80G(5)(vi) of the Act, rejecting the recognition under section 80G of the Act.
ITA No.1435(B)/2019 2
It has been submitted that assessee had made an application under section 80G on 06/10/18. It was submitted that assessee was granted certification under section 12AA of the Act, vide certificate dated 17/07/98 placed at page-10 of paper book, which is valid as on date. Further, assessee submitted that Ld.CIT(A) was satisfied with activities carried out by assessee to be charitable in nature and therefore, erred in rejecting application of assessee seeking registration under section 80G of the IT Act, 1961. 3.1 Ld. Senior DR placed reliance upon orders passed by authorities below. 4. We have perused submissions advanced by both sides in the light of records placed before us. 4.1 Upon considering the documents filed by assessee in the paper book, it is observed that denial of 80G registration by Ld.CIT (E) is not sustainable in law. It is observed that assessee has obtained certification under section 12A, which has not been rejected or disputed by Ld. CIT(E). However, in impugned order Ld.CIT(E) is not doubting objects of assessee and has not brought anything on record to establish any violation of objects on behalf of assessee. 4.2 We are therefore of the view, that assessee should not have been denied registration under section 80G of the IT Act, 1961. We accordingly set aside this issue back to Ld.CIT(A) to consider application filed by assessee dated 16/10/18 in accordance with law. (B)/2019 3 Accordingly we allow the appeal filed by assessee. In the result appeal filed by assessee stands allowed. Order pronounced in the open court on 29-11-2019.
More judgments on Section 80G
- Savan Dayalal Ladani, Rajkot vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-2(1)…ITA 575/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pareshbhai Savjibhai Khunt, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 2(2)(3), RajkotITA 842/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026