M/S. VIMALALAYA HOSPITAL TRUST,BANGALORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), BANGALORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1435/BANG/2019Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 November 2019AY 2019-203 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the denial of 80G registration was not sustainable in law. Since the assessee had a valid 12AA registration and no violations were established, the CIT(A) should have considered the application.

What were the facts?

The assessee, Vimalalaya Hospital Trust, applied for recognition under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(A) rejected the application, despite the assessee having valid registration under Section 12AA.

What were the issues?

Whether the denial of Section 80G recognition is justified when the assessee possesses a valid Section 12AA registration and no violations are proven.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80G,Section 12AA

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES : “B”, BANGALORE

Before: SHRI B.R.BASKARAN & SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICAL MEMBER

For Appellant: Shri Narendra Kumar Jain, Advocate
For Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, CIT-DR

PER SMT BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER: Present appeal has been filed by assessee against order dated 29/04/19 passed by Ld. CIT (A), Bangalore for assessment year 2017-18 to 2019-20 under section 80G(5)(vi) of the Act, rejecting the recognition under section 80G of the Act.

ITA No.1435(B)/2019 2

2.

It has been submitted that assessee had made an application under section 80G on 06/10/18. It was submitted that assessee was granted certification under section 12AA of the Act, vide certificate dated 17/07/98 placed at page-10 of paper book, which is valid as on date. Further, assessee submitted that Ld.CIT(A) was satisfied with activities carried out by assessee to be charitable in nature and therefore, erred in rejecting application of assessee seeking registration under section 80G of the IT Act, 1961. 3.1 Ld. Senior DR placed reliance upon orders passed by authorities below. 4. We have perused submissions advanced by both sides in the light of records placed before us. 4.1 Upon considering the documents filed by assessee in the paper book, it is observed that denial of 80G registration by Ld.CIT (E) is not sustainable in law. It is observed that assessee has obtained certification under section 12A, which has not been rejected or disputed by Ld. CIT(E). However, in impugned order Ld.CIT(E) is not doubting objects of assessee and has not brought anything on record to establish any violation of objects on behalf of assessee. 4.2 We are therefore of the view, that assessee should not have been denied registration under section 80G of the IT Act, 1961. We accordingly set aside this issue back to Ld.CIT(A) to consider application filed by assessee dated 16/10/18 in accordance with law. (B)/2019 3 Accordingly we allow the appeal filed by assessee. In the result appeal filed by assessee stands allowed. Order pronounced in the open court on 29-11-2019.

More judgments on Section 80G

All 6,482 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80G →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →