ITO 33 (2)(5), MUMBAI vs. PRAKASH J. BHARADIA, MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to sustain only 12.5% disallowance on bogus purchases. It reasoned that when sales are not doubted, 100% disallowance is not justified, but purchases from the grey market warrant some disallowance to meet the ends of justice.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s decision to reduce the addition for bogus purchases from 25% to 12.5%. The assessee, an interior and event management contractor, was found to have made purchases from bogus dealers.
What were the issues?
Whether 100% disallowance of purchases is justified when sales are not doubted, and what is the appropriate disallowance percentage for purchases made from grey market dealers.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “SMC”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA
This is an appeal by the Revenue wherein the Revenue is aggrieved that the learned CIT(A) has reduced the addition of bogus purchase by sustaining only 12.5% disallowance on account of bogus purchases, vide order dated 22.08.2018 pertaining to assessment year 2010-11.
The assessee in this case is engaged in business of interior, exhibition contractor and event management. The assessment was reopened upon information from Sales Tax Department that assessee has made purchases from bogus dealers. The Assessing Officer in this case has made 25% addition on account of bogus purchase amounting to Rs.2,01,521/-.
Shri Prakash J. Bharadia 3. Upon assessee’s appeal, learned CIT(A) has noted that the sales has not been doubted. Accordingly, placing reliance upon several case laws and up on the facts of the case, he sustained 12.5% disallowance out of the bogus purchases. Against above order, Revenue is in appeal before the ITAT.
I have heard the learned DR and perused the records. I find that in this case the sales have not been doubted. It is settled law that when sales are not doubted, hundred percent disallowance for bogus purchase cannot be done, the rationale being no sales is possible without actual purchases. This proposition is supported by Honourable Jurisdictional High Court decision in the case of Nickunj Eximp Enterprises (P.) Ltd. vs ACIT (in Writ Petition no. 2860 of 2012, order dated 18.6.2014). In this case the Honourable High Court has upheld hundred percent allowance for the purchases said to be bogus when sales are not doubted. However, the facts of the present case indicate that assessee has made purchase from the grey market. Making purchases through the grey market gives the assessee savings on account of non-payment of tax and others at the expense of the exchequer. In such a situation, in my considered opinion, on the facts and circumstances of the case, 12.5 % disallowance out of the bogus purchases done by the learned CIT(A) meets the end of justice. Accordingly, I uphold the order of learned CIT(A).
In the result, this appeal filed by the Revenue stands dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 4th February, 2020.
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026