SREE NARAYANA DHARMA PARIPALANA YUVAJANA SAMITHI,KODUNGALLUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER EXEMPTION WARD- THRISSUR, THRISSUR
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the profits earned from the 'Kuri' business are utilized for achieving the objects of the trust and are therefore eligible for exemption under Section 11 of the Act. This issue was previously covered by the Tribunal's decision in the assessee's own case.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable trust, declared income of Rs. 11,39,180/- after claiming exemption u/s. 11 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2012-13. The Assessing Officer (AO) assessed the income from a 'Kuri' business as business income, rejecting the claim that it was for charitable purposes. This action was upheld by the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether the income from the 'Kuri' business is eligible for exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act as being incidental to the charitable objects of the trust.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM
O R D E R Per: Inturi Rama Rao, AM This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-5, Mumbai [CIT(A)] dated 11.03.2025 for Assessment Year (AY) 2012-13.
Brief facts of the case are that the appellant is a charitable trust duly registered u/s. 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). The return of income for AY 2012-13 on 15.03.2013 declaring total income of Rs. 11,39,180/- after claiming exemption u/s. 11 of the Act. Against the said return of income, the assessment was Sree Narayana Dharma Paripalana Youvajana Samithi completed by the ITO (Exemption), Thrissur vide order dated 27.02.2015 passed u/s. 143(3) of the Act at a total income of Rs. 25,75,620/-. While doing so, the AO assessed the income earned from business of Kuri of Rs. 25,75,621/- as business income by rejecting the contention of the appellant that the business is held under the trust for charitable purposes.
Being aggrieved, an appeal was filed before the CIT(A), who vide the impugned order confirmed the action of the AO by holding that running of Kuri business was not incidental to attainment of objects of the appellant trust.
Being aggrieved, the appellant is in appeal before this Tribunal in the present appeal.
The learned counsel for the assessee submitted that in earlier assessment years the assessee’s claim for exemption u/s. 11 of the Act was allowed by the Tribunal placing reliance on the decision of the Hon'ble Kerala High Court in the case of Biowin Agro Research v. ITO (Exemption), wherein, it is held that the income of the business is utilised for genuine purposes of the trust or incidental to attainment of the object of the trust, is eligible for exemption u/s. 11 of the Act.
On the other hand, the learned Sr. DR supported the orders of the learned lower authorities, submitting that no interference is called for.
Sree Narayana Dharma Paripalana Youvajana Samithi 7. I heard the rival contentions and perused the material available on record. The appellant is a trust running business of Kuri. This business is held under trust. The profits earned from this business are utilised for the purpose of achieving the objects of the trust. Therefore, the profits earned from running Kuri business are eligible for exemption u/s. 11 of the Act. This issue is already covered by the decision of the Tribunal in assessee’s own case in to 154/Coch/2024 vide order dated 08.11.2024. Therefore, I direct the AO to delete the addition.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 23rd June, 2025.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026