GANNAMANI SRINIVASA RAO,HYDERABAD vs. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VISAKHAPATNAM
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found sufficient cause for the assessee's non-appearance before the CIT(A) based on the medical report. Therefore, the Tribunal decided to grant one more opportunity to the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was against an ex-parte order passed by the CIT(A). The assessee's counsel submitted that the assessee could not appear due to a serious liver condition and subsequent transplantation.
What were the issues?
Whether the ex-parte order passed by the CIT(A) was justified and if the assessee had sufficient cause for non-appearance.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO & SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH
आदेश /O R D E R Per V.DURGA RAO, Judicial Member:
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), [CIT(A)]-1, Guntur dated 24.10.2016 for the assessment year 2009-10.
2 I.T.A No.125/Viz/2017 Gannamani Srinivasa Rao, Visakhapatnam
When this appeal is taken up for hearing, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the Ld.CIT(A) passed ex-parte order and the same may be set aside and alternatively he has submitted that one more opportunity may be given to the assessee to substantiate his case before the Ld.CIT(A). When being asked the Ld.Counsel for the assesseee, the reasons for not appearing before the Ld.CIT(A), it is submitted that the assessee is suffering with liver parenchymal disease and subsequently he underwent liver transplantation, therefore, he was not able to appear before the Ld.CIT(A).
On the other hand, the Ld.DR strongly supported the order passed by the authorities below.
After hearing both the sides and after perusing the medical report filed by the assessee dated 28.11.2014, we find there is a sufficient cause for not appearing before the CIT(A). Therefore, in our opinion, one more opportunity should be given to the assessee to meet the ends of justice. Accordingly, we set aside the order passed by the Ld.CIT(A) and remit the matter back to CIT(A) to adjudicate the issue in accordance with law after giving reasonable opportunity to the assessee.
3 I.T.A No.125/Viz/2017 Gannamani Srinivasa Rao, Visakhapatnam
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.
The above order was pronounced in the open court on 18th July, 2018.
Sd/- Sd/- (धड.एस. सुन्दर ससह) (िी.दुगाा राि) (D.S. SUNDER SINGH) (V. DURGA RAO) लेखा सदस्य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER न्याधयक सदस्य/JUDICIAL MEMBER धिशाखापटणम /Visakhapatnam ददिांक /Dated : 18.07.2018 L.Rama, SPS
आदेश कीप्रधिधल धपअग्रेधर्ि/Copy of the order forwarded to:- 1. ननर्ााररती/ The Assessee- Sri Gannamani Srinivasa Rao, H.No.55, Green City Nr Apparel Export Park, Vadlapudi Post, Visakhapatnam 530 046 2. राजस्व/ The Revenue – ACIT, Circle-4(1), Visakhapatnam 3. The Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Visakhapatnam 4. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1,Guntur 5. धिभागीयप्रधिधिधि, आयकरअपीलीयअधिकरण, धिशाखापटणम /DR, ITAT, Visakhapatnam 6.गाडाफ़ाईल / Guard file आदेशािुसार / BY ORDER // True Copy //
Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, VISAKHAPATNAM
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026