CHATTA KUNKATTY SREEHARI, PROPRIETOR SREESADAN TRADERS,KANNUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found no basis for the CIT(A) to estimate the profit at 17% and held that such estimation should be based on past history and not be arbitrary. The matter was remitted back to the AO to adopt the average GP rate of the preceding three years.
What were the facts?
The assessee, engaged in the business of Ayurvedic products, filed a return for AY 2018-19. The AO completed the assessment by estimating the gross profit at 30% of the turnover, rejecting the books of account. The CIT(A) directed the AO to estimate the profit at 17% of the turnover.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in estimating the profit at 17% of the turnover without proper basis.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM
These appeals filed by the assessees are directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Kochi [CIT(A)] dated 30.06.2025 for Assessment Year (AY) 2018-19. 2. Since identical issues and facts are involved in these appeals, they are heard together and disposed of by this common order. For bearing ITA No. 610/Coch/2025 for AY 2018-19 are stated herein.
The appellant is an individual engaged in the business of dealing with Ayurvedic products. The return of income for AY 2018-19 was filed on 2
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 44AD
- Mohammed Javed Bhati, Sikar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, SikarITA 994/JPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Rangoli Hotel, Mehsana vs DCIT, Circle, Gandhinagar, GandhiangarITA 2286/AHD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Sonu Jain, Agra vs ITO WD(1)(1)(2), AgraITA 671/AGR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sarvjeet Singh Through Legal Heir Manjit… vs ITO Ward 1(1), AlwarITA 355/JPR/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026