MR. ANIL,ERNAKULAM vs. ITO NON CORP WARD-1(1), KOCHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee was denied a reasonable opportunity to present their case on merits due to the dismissal on limitation. The Tribunal decided to restore the matter to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) for de novo adjudication on the issue of limitation, while also directing the assessee to file an affidavit explaining the delay.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) with a significant delay, citing ill health of the Chartered Accountant as the reason. The Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal solely on the grounds of limitation without considering the merits. This appeal before the ITAT is against that dismissal.
What were the issues?
Whether the Ld. CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the appeal solely on grounds of limitation without considering the merits, and if a lenient approach should be adopted for condoning the delay.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 250,Section 147,Section 144B,Section 139(1),Section 148,Section 271AAC(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Vijay Vishin Meghani v. DCIT137 citing86 Taxmann.com 98 · 2017 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM & SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE, JM
Per: Anikesh Banerjee, JM Instant group of appeal of the assessee is preferred against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [for brevity, ‘Ld.CIT(A)’] passed under section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in shot, ‘the Act) for the Assessment Year 2017-18, date of orders 13/06/2025 & 17/06/2025. The impugned orders emanated from the order of the National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi (for brevity, the “Ld. AO”) passed under section 147 r.w.s. 144B of the Act, date Mr. Anil of order 29/03/2022 and order passed u/s 271AAC(1) of the Act, date of order 07/09/2022. 2. Both the appeals have common issue. All the appeals are heard together& disposed of together. ITA No. 614/Coch/2025 is taken as lead case
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026