SHREE VARSHA INVESTORS & TRADERS PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT CIR. 9(1), KOLKATA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee intended to withdraw the appeal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The Revenue had no objection to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order of the CIT(A). During the pendency of the appeal, the assessee opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's intention to withdraw the appeal after opting for a tax settlement scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH “SMC” KOLKATA
Before: Shri SANJAY GARG
आदेश /O R D E R The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 03.10.2017 of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-3, Kolkata [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT(A)’].
At the outset, Ld. counsel for the assessee has submitted that since the assessee has opted for “Viviad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020” and, therefore, he intends to withdraw the present appeal. The Ld. DR has no objection for the said withdrawal.
Shree Varsha Investors & Traders Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT, Cir-9(1),Kol. Page 2 In view of the above, the appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed as ‘Withdrawn’.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026