RASHIK GUPTA,DELHI vs. ACIT, CIR.-29, KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 446/KOL/2020Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 January 2021AY 2005-062 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal restored the matter to the Assessing Officer to verify the assessee's plea regarding his status as a joint account holder during the deposit period. The Assessing Officer was directed to provide a definite finding after calling for evidence.

What were the facts?

The assessee challenged the disallowance of Rs. 1,85,500 on account of unexplained cash deposits in a bank account. The assessee claimed the deposits were made when he was not a joint account holder.

What were the issues?

Whether the cash deposits in the bank account were attributable to the assessee, considering his claim of not being a joint account holder at the time of deposit.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH “SMC” KOLKATA

Before: Shri SANJAY GARG

O R D E R

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →