DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. ALL GROW FINANCE & INVESTMENT PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that as per CBDT Circular No. 3/2018, the Department shall not file appeals where the tax effect does not exceed Rs. 20 lakhs. The Revenue's appeal was therefore not maintainable.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order quashing re-assessment proceedings where the Assessing Officer had made an addition of Rs. 38,52,000/-. The tax effect in the appeal was less than Rs. 20 lakhs.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable before the Tribunal given the tax effect and the CBDT circular regarding monetary limits for appeals.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES “E”: DELHI
Before: SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI & DR. B.R.R. KUMAR
This appeal by Revenue has been directed against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)-1, New Delhi, Dated 30.03.2016, for the A.Y. 2009-2010, challenging the Order of Ld. CIT(A) in quashing the re- assessment proceedings. The A.O. in the re-assessment proceedings made the addition of Rs.38,52,000/-.
2 ITA.No.3349/Del./2016 All Grow Finance & Investment Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.
Admittedly, the tax effect in the present appeal is less than Rs.20 lakhs. Vide Circular No.3/2018Dated 11th July, 2018 issued by CBDT, it has been directed that the Department shall not file appeal before the Tribunal in case where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limit of Rs.20 lakhs. It is also directed that this instruction will apply retrospectively to pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in Tribunals. Pending appeals below the specified tax limit may be withdrawn/not pressed. The Ld. D.R. in view of the Board’s Circular above did not press the Departmental Appeal. The case of the Department would not fall in the exceptions provided in the above Board Circular. In the result, the Departmental appeal is not maintainable as the appeal is filed against the Board instructions referred to above and therefore, the appeal of the Department is liable to be dismissed.
In the result, appeal of the Department is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open Court. Sd/- Sd/- (Dr. B.R.R. KUMAR) (BHAVNESH SAINI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Delhi, Dated 09th July, 2019 VBP/-
3 ITA.No.3349/Del./2016 All Grow Finance & Investment Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026