HARE RAM MANDIR TRUST,BHOPAL vs. ITO-EXEMPTION, BHOPAL
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee came to know about the intimation order only upon receipt of the demand recovery notice. Therefore, the rectification application was filed within the prescribed time limit. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and remanded the matter to the AO.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a religious trust, filed a rectification application under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act after a delay, claiming that agricultural income rebate was not given. The AO rejected the application as time-barred. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision.
What were the issues?
Whether the rectification application filed by the assessee was within the prescribed time limit, considering the date of knowledge of the intimation order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 253,Section 154,Section 10(23C)(v),Section 143(1),Section 246A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: SHRI B.M. BIYANI & SHRI PARESH M JOSHI
Per Paresh M Joshi, J.M:
This is an appeal filed by the assessee Under Section 253 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act” for sake of brevity) before this Tribunal. The assessee is aggrieved by the order bearing Number ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-
25/1066383230(1) dated 03.07.2024 passed by the Ld. CIT(A)
u/s 250 of the Act which is hereinafter referred to as the “Impugned order”. The relevant Assessment Year is 2014-15
Hare Ram Mandir Trust ITA Nos.769 & 7708/Ind/2024 - A.Ys. 2014-15 & 2015-16 and the corresponding previous year period is from 01.04.2013 to 31.03.2014. 2. FACTU
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026