BOOPATHY INVESTMENTS P LTD,SIVAKASI vs. ACIT CORPORATE CIRCLE-1, MADURAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal permitted the assessees and the Revenue to withdraw their respective appeals. The decision was based on the parties opting for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme for dispute resolution.
What were the facts?
A batch of appeals were filed by assessees and the Revenue. Both parties had opted to avail the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020, and Form No. 3 was issued for settlement of tax disputes.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals should be permitted to be withdrawn by the parties who have opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme for settlement of tax disputes.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘D’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI DUVVURU R.L. REDDY & SHRI S. JAYARAMAN
Heard together (6 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
आदेश / O R D E R PER BENCH:
This bunch of ‘06’ appeals filed by different assesses/Revenue are directed against orders of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Madurai/Chennai, even dated 26.12.2019, 27.12.2019, 26.12.2019, 26.11.2019 & 25.06.2019 for the respective assessment years.
The Assessee’s appeal in is delayed by ‘09’ days, for which, the assessee has filed Affidavit for condonation of the delay, to which, the Revenue has not raised any serious objection.
Consequently, the delay of ‘09’ days in filing of the appeal stands condoned and the appeal is disposed off on merits. -343/C/20, 337/C/20 & 2656/C/19 :- 4 -:
The Revenue’s appeal in is delayed by ‘03’ days, for which, the AO has filed the affidavit for ‘03’ days requesting for condonation of delay, to which, the Ld.Counsel of the assessee has not raised any serious objection. Consequently, the delay of ‘03’ days in filing of the appeal stands condoned and accordingly, the Revenue’s appeal is disposed off.
When these appeals were taken up for hearing, the learned Counsels for the Assessee/Revenue has submitted that the Assessee/Revenue has opted to avail the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020 and Form No.3 were also issued. It has submitted that it may be permitted to withdraw the appeal.
On the other hand, the learned Departmental Representative has not raised any objection to the submissions of the learned Counsels for the Assessee.
We have heard both the sides, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of the authorities below.
In this case, the Assessees/Revenue have opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020 and the Designated Authority has issued Form No.3 for the settlement of pending tax dispute. Accordingly, it prayed that it may be permitted to withdraw the appeal.
In view of the submissions of the Assessees/Revenue, the appeals filed by the Assessees/Revenue are permitted to be withdrawn. However, it is open to the Assessees/Revenue to approach the Tribunal by filing an appropriate application in the event of any injustice caused to the Assessees/Revenue in -343/C/20, 337/C/20 & 2656/C/19 :- 5 -: respect of the settlement of dispute relating to the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020.
In the result, all the appeals of the Assessees as well as the Revenue are dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on the 1st day of April, 2021, in Chennai.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026