MUTHUSWAMY & CO,CHENNAI vs. ITO WARD-5, TIRUNELVELI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, allowing the assessee to utilize the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. Liberty was granted to restore the appeal if the scheme application is rejected.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal belatedly. The assessee intended to settle the dispute under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, and had filed initial forms. The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY & SHRI S. JAYARAMAN
आदेश/ O R D E R
PER S. JAYARAMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The assessee filed this appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- 1, Madurai in dated 08.11.2019 for the assessment year 2013-14.
:-2-: ITA No: 455/Chny/2020
The Ld. AR submitted that the assessee filed the appeal belatedly by 22 days and pleaded to condone the delay.
We heard the rival contentions. We find that the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause for filing the appeal belatedly. Therefore, we condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication.
The above case was heard through video conferencing. At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee wanted to utilize the Direct Taxes ‘Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020’ to settle pending dispute relating to Direct Taxes and in this regard the assessee has filed form No 1 and 2 and awaiting for form No. 3 from the designated authority.
The Bench has considered rival contentions of both sides and after hearing both parties, we find that the assessee has filed form no 1 and 2 and awaiting for form no. 3 from the designated authority. Therefore, once the assessee filed a declaration in Form No.1 along with undertaking and expressed their willingness to settle pending disputes regarding direct taxes, then there is no point in keeping the appeal filed by the assessee. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal filed the assessee, supra, as withdrawn. However, liberty is given to the assessee to restore the appeal, in the event of the Designated Authority, for any reason reject the application filed by the :-3-: ITA No: 455/Chny/2020 assessee under section 4 of the said Act. We, further make it clear that if the assessee has for any reason opted out from the scheme or the applicant under the scheme misrepresent any fact which resulted in rejection of application filed under the scheme, then the provisions of section 4(6) of the Act, shall be applicable to such appeal and in such case, the proceedings and the claims which were withdrawn under section 4 and all the consequences under the Income-tax Act against the declarant assessee shall be deemed to have been revived. We, further make it clear that the assessee should promptly inform the Assessing Officer about their decision to opt out of the scheme or rejection of application by the designated authority to the Assessing Officer, so as to enable to file miscellaneous application to restore the appeals.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on 08th April, 2021 at Chennai.
More judgments on Section 4
- Prakash Dayaram Chandnani, Rajkot vs ITO Ward 2(1)(1), RajkotITA 927/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Hiteshkumar Mohanlal Desai, Daman vs The Assessment Unit, ITO, Daman Ward, DamanITA 962/SRT/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Hiteshkumar Mohanlal Desai, Daman vs The Assessment Unit, ITO, Daman Ward, DamanITA 962/SRT/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Ratilal Manubhai Dhanani, Amreli vs ITO WD 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 697/RJT/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Ratilal Manubhai Dhanani, Amreli vs ITO WD 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 697/RJT/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026