ASST. CIT 31(3), MUMBAI vs. M/S VNC INFRAPROJECTS, MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeal was not maintainable because the additions were based on estimation and did not necessarily indicate concealment of income. Furthermore, the appeal did not meet the monetary limits set by the CBDT's low tax effect circular.
What were the facts?
The revenue appealed against the deletion of penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) for Assessment Year 2009-10. The penalty was based on additions made for alleged bogus purchases, which were later restricted by the first appellate authority.
What were the issues?
Whether penalty under Section 271(1)(c) is leviable when additions are based on estimation and whether the appeal is maintainable in light of low tax effect circulars.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “F” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JM & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
1 Assessment Year: 2009-10 आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण “एफ” "ायपीठ मुंबई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “F” BENCH, MUMBAI माननीय "ी श""जीत दे, "ाियक सद" एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JM AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM (Hearing Through Video Conferencing Mode) आयकर अपील सं./ (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2009-10) ACIT-31(3) , Mumbai M/s. VNC Infraprojects Room No.623, 6th Floor 29/B, 1st Floor, Panchratna Building बनाम/ Kautilya Bhavan, Near Videsh Bhavan S.V. Road, Goregaon (W) Vs. Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East) Mumbai-400 090. Mumbai-400 051. PAN/GIR No. AAPFM-1184-L (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : Assessee by : Shri Ramniklal U. Jain-Ld. AR Revenue by : Shri Chintamani Dingankar-Ld. DR सुनवाई की तारीख/ : 25/11/2020 Date of Hearing घोषणा की तारीख / : 25/11/2020 Date of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026