NETRA SEVA KENDRA,PUJNE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTION, PUNE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 139/PUN/2020Status: DisposedITAT Pune07 July 2022AY 2019-20202 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the CIT(Exemption)'s finding of non-furnishing of details was incorrect and that the assessee required another opportunity. The matter was remanded to the CIT(Exemption) for further examination.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an online application for approval of its trust under Section 12AA. The CIT(Exemption) rejected the application citing incomplete information regarding the amended Trust Deed/MOA.

What were the issues?

Whether the rejection of the trust's approval under Section 12AA was justified based on the provided information, and if the assessee should be granted another opportunity.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AA

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, PUNE

Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI

For Appellant: Shri Sarvesh Khandelwal

PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JM :

1.

This appeal by the assessee against the order dated 30-11-2019 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Pune [(‘CIT(Exemption’)] for assessment year 2019-20.

2.

Heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. We note that the assessee made an online application in Form No. 10A for approval of the Trust/Institution u/s. 12AA of the Act on 05-05-2019. The CIT(Exemption) issued letter to the assessee requesting to upload certain information/clarification. In compliance, the assessee uploaded details in ITBA portal. According to the CIT(Exemption) the compliance made by the assessee is not complete in respect of amended copy of Trust Deed/MOA. The ld. AR submits that all the details sought by the CIT(Exemption) were uploaded and the finding of non-furnishing of details by the CIT(Exemption) is incorrect. Therefore, we find the order of CIT(Exemption) in rejecting the approval u/s. 12AA of the Act is not justified and the assessee requires another opportunity in support of its claim. The ld. DR did not report objection in remanding the matter to the file of CIT(Exemption). Therefore, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice, we deem it proper to remand the matter to the file of CIT(Exemption) for necessary examination and the assessee is liberty to file evidences, if any, in support of its claim. Thus, the grounds raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose.

3.

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.

Order pronounced in the open court on 07th July, 2022.

Sd/- Sd/- (R.S. Syal) (S.S. Viswanethra Ravi) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT पुणे / Pune; दिनाांक / Dated : 07th July, 2022. रदव आदेश की प्रधिधलधप अग्रेधर्ि / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलार्थी / The Appellant. 1. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent. 2. 3. The CIT, Exemption, Pune 4. The Addl./Joint CIT, Exemption Range, Pune दवभागीय प्रदतदनदि, आयकर अपीलीय अदिकरण, “ए” बेंच, 5. पुणे / DR, ITAT, “A” Bench, Pune. गार्ड फ़ाइल / Guard File. 6. //सत्यादपत प्रदत// True Copy// आिेशानुसार / BY ORDER,

वररष्ठ दनजी सदचव / Sr. Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अदिकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune

More judgments on Section 12AA

All 4,243 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AA →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →