DIAWAR R SHAIKH,PUNE vs. DCIT CIR-8, PUNE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The assessee was granted liberty to raise all grounds in other pending appeals.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed three appeals against penalty orders for assessment years 2009-10 to 2011-12. The assessee subsequently filed a letter requesting to withdraw these appeals.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The Tribunal considered the assessee's wish to consolidate arguments in other pending cases.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH, PUNE
ORDER PER S.S. GODARA, JM : These assessee’s three appeals for A.Y. 2009-10 to 2011-12 arise against the CIT(A)- 9, Pune’s separate orders all dated 27-03-2018 in Case No. PN/CIT(A)-6/DDCIT-Cir.8/335(B)/ 2015-16/123, PN/CIT(A)-6 / DDCIT- Cir.8/335(B) / 2015-16/124 and PN/CIT(A)-6/DDCIT-Cir.8/335(B)/2015-16/125 respectively in proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in short “the Act”.
Heard both the parties. Case files perused.
It emerges at the outset that the learned counsel has filed a letter dated of even date that the assessee no more wishes to press for all the three appeals since he has already filed as many cases against the very penalties to935/PUN/2018 pending for hearing on 18-07-2022. He seeks to withdraw all these three cases therefore. The Revenue is fair enough in not disputing all these averments. Faced with this situation, we accept the assessee’s request to withdraw all these three appeals with liberty to raise all factual as well as legal grounds in the three cases in ITA No. 933 to 935/PUN/2018. Ordered accordingly.
These assessee’s three appeals are dismissed as withdrawn in above terms. A copy of this common order be placed in the respective case files. Order pronounced in the open Court on this 19th day of July 2022.
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026