M/S. PARRYS SUGARS REFINERY INDIA PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE 5 (1), CHENNAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1867/CHNY/2019Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 May 2021AY 2015-162 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal as they had opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme. The assessee was given liberty to approach the Tribunal if any injustice occurred regarding the settlement.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against an order of the CIT(A) for AY 2015-16. During the hearing, the assessee's counsel submitted that the assessee had opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme and requested to withdraw the appeal.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee can withdraw their appeal after opting for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Before: Shri Duvvuru RL Reddy & Shri G. Manjunatha

Hearing: 28.04.2021Pronounced: 03.05.2021

O R D E R

PER DUVVURU RL REDDY, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

1.

The assessee filed this appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Chennai, in dated 12.04.2019 for the Assessment Year 2015-2016.

2.

When this appeal was taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the Assessee has submitted that the Assessee has opted to avail the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020 and Form No.3 was also issued. He has submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the appeal.

3.

On the other hand, the learned Departmental Representative has not raised any objection to the submissions of the learned Counsel for the Assessee.

4.

We have heard both the sides through video-conferencing, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of the authorities below.

5.

In this case, the Assessee has opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020 and the Designated Authority has issued Form No.3 for the settlement of pending tax dispute. Accordingly, he prayed that he may be permitted to withdraw the appeal.

6.

In view of the submissions of the Assessee, the appeal filed by the Assessee is permitted to be withdrawn. However, it is open to the Assessee to approach the Tribunal by filing an appropriate application in the event of any injustice caused to the Assessee in respect of the settlement of dispute relating to the Vivad-se- Vishwas Scheme 2020.

7.

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee in is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced on the 3rd May, 2021 in Chennai.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →