CHANDULAL VEERCHAND JAIN,MUMBAI vs. DY. CIT CC-4(2), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 4839/MUM/2019Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 November 2020AY 2014-152 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal acknowledged the settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT. The assessee subsequently filed a withdrawal letter stating the matter was settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020. The Revenue did not oppose the withdrawal.

What were the issues?

Whether an appeal pending before the ITAT should be dismissed when the underlying dispute has been settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI ‘C’ BENCH, MUMBAI

O R D E R Per Pramod Kumar, VP:

1.

The assessee has moved petition seeking withdrawal of the appeal on the ground that the matter is settled under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020 2. Learned Departmental Representative does not oppose the prayer so made by the assessee. 3. There is no dispute that once the matter is resolved under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020, the related appeal is required to be withdrawn. 4. In view of the above position, as also bearing in mind entirety of the case, we deem it fit and proper to dismiss the appeal as withdrawn.

Assessment Year: 2014-15 Page 2 of 2 5. In the result, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Pronounced in the open court today on the 27th day of November 2020.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →