SHOPPERS ORBIT APARTMENTS,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER - 7(4), PUNE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that interest income from fixed deposits made in a nationalized bank does not satisfy the mutuality test, following a jurisdictional bench decision.
What were the facts?
The assessee challenged the assessment of interest income from fixed deposits as income from other sources, arguing for mutuality. The lower authorities denied this benefit.
What were the issues?
Whether interest income earned by the assessee from fixed deposits in a nationalized bank qualifies for the principle of mutuality.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Bangalore Club v. CIT247 citing5 SCC 509 · 2013 · SC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “SMC”, PUNE
Before: SHRI S. S. GODARA
ORDER
PER S. S. GODARA, JM:
This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2017-18 arises against the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi’s order dated 24.06.2021 passed in case no.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2021- 22/1033651984(1) involving proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short “the Act”. Heard both the parties. Case files perused.
It transpires during the course of hearing that the assessee’s sole substantive grievance challenges correctness of both the learned lower authorities’ action assessing its interest income of Rs.1,57,786/- derived from fixed deposits made in M/s Vijaya Bank as income from other sources thereby declining its “mutuality” plea. 3. Learned counsel vehemently reiterated the assessee’s stand. He strongly argued that both the learned lower authorities have erred in law and on facts in denying mutuality benefit to the assessee in light of the tribunal’s decision in Swarn Jayanti Rail Nagar Flat Owners Association vs. ITO in to 2010/Del/2018 dated 28.11.2018 after considering hon’ble apex court’s landmark decision in Bangalore Club vs. CIT (2013) 5 SCC 509 (SC). I find no merit in the assessee’s argument as the jurisdictional bench of the tribunal in ACIT vs. M/s. Poona Club Ltd. ITA No.1481/PUN/2016 dated 26.09.2018 holds that such an interest income fails the mutuality tests on ground of fixed deposits made in a nationalized bank. I therefore go by the foregoing latter judicial precedent to reject the assessee’s instant sole substantive ground. Ordered accordingly. 4. This assessee’s appeal is dismissed in above terms. Order pronounced on this 26th day of July, 2022. Sd/- (S. S. GODARA) JUDICIAL MEMBER पुणे / Pune; �दनांक / Dated : 26th July, 2022. Sujeet (DOC)
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026